Attacking FDE hardware solutions: Difference between revisions
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Previously published research == | == Previously published research == | ||
== Standards relating to FDE at the hardware level == | == Standards and Whitepapers relating to FDE at the hardware level == | ||
[http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=dn_sec_white_paper_case_study&vgnextoid=867f83bedbc93110VgnVCM100000f5ee0a0aRCRD White Papers and Case Studies | |||
by Seagate] | |||
== Other related documents == | == Other related documents == | ||
Revision as of 20:35, 18 January 2009
Many companies tout hard drives with built in encryption as the solution to the Cold Boot Attack. Additionally, these drives are sold as a major step forward in overall data security. In theory, this sounds like a good idea; in practice this could go horribly wrong.
This project is currently in a research state to find different drives that claim to offer specific security properties. It is expected that many products will fail even the most cursory look.
Please add links to products, vendors, standards, prices and places to purchase hardware. At some point, we'll start acquiring hardware to do specific implementation analysis.
Drive manufacturers and specific drive models
Previously published research
Standards and Whitepapers relating to FDE at the hardware level
[http://www.seagate.com/ww/v/index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=dn_sec_white_paper_case_study&vgnextoid=867f83bedbc93110VgnVCM100000f5ee0a0aRCRD White Papers and Case Studies by Seagate]