Difference between revisions of "CommunityWorkingGroup"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
(lots of major structural and conceptual edits)
(major conceptual work (un-narrowing the focus a bit))
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Bringing the Noisebridge community together to resolve interpersonal and intergroup disagreements.'''
+
'''Bringing the Noisebridge community together to create a better space for all.'''
  
The goal of the Community Working Group is to attempt to solve social conflicts BEFORE they boil over into "drama".
+
The goal of the Community Working Group is to solve problems as a group that we have historically failed to solve as individuals.
  
We'd like to see people as individuals worthy of continued participation in Noisebridge, even when they make mistakes.  We believe that misunderstandings happen, and that no one is perfect.  We believe that the vast majority of people have good intentions and really just want to hack!
+
For example:
  
We also believe that harassment is a serious problem and not to be taken lightly. So while some disagreements may be treated as minor interpersonal misunderstandings, some should be referred out to another group specifically set up to handle harassment. ([[User:flamsmark]] is working on this group)
+
* keeping the space clean and physically safe.
 +
* resolving interpersonal conflicts before they become "drama".
 +
* maintaining commonly used facilities by delegating responsiblity (and making sure to award recognition!)
 +
* hosting social events that encourage greater connectedness, without putting extra pressure on the space.
  
Finally, we agree that certain behaviors -- particularly sleeping in the space and drug use -- can endanger our relationship with our landlord and jeopardize our lease.  We hope to be able to refer individuals to local hostels, clinics, and shelters to assist them, rather than having them use Noisebridge as a halfway house or having Noisebridge throw them out.
 
  
 +
The CWG may spin off subgroups as needed or desired, groups which can expect no "control" from its parent group, but which should probably check in from time to time.  The idea should always be to keep the community informally informed of all of the goings-on at Noisebridge.  See also FractalWorkingGroup
  
 
=== Working Group Members ===
 
=== Working Group Members ===
Line 17: Line 20:
  
 
''.....need moar members''
 
''.....need moar members''
 +
 +
 +
 +
=== On the Philosophy of Resolving Conflicts ===
 +
 +
We'd like to see people as individuals worthy of continued participation in Noisebridge, even when they make mistakes.  We believe that misunderstandings happen, and that no one is perfect.  We believe that the vast majority of people have good intentions and really just want to hack!
 +
 +
We also believe that harassment is a serious problem and not to be taken lightly.  So while some disagreements may be treated as minor interpersonal misunderstandings, some should be referred out to another group specifically set up to handle harassment.  ([[User:flamsmark]] is working on this group)
 +
 +
Finally, we agree that certain behaviors -- particularly sleeping in the space and drug use -- can endanger our relationship with our landlord and jeopardize our lease.  We hope to be able to refer individuals to local hostels, clinics, and shelters to assist them, rather than having them use Noisebridge as a halfway house or having Noisebridge throw them out.
 +
  
 
=== Working Group Meetings ===
 
=== Working Group Meetings ===
Line 26: Line 40:
  
 
* making a New Member Packet containing info about processes, participation, etc, and probably stickers or something too
 
* making a New Member Packet containing info about processes, participation, etc, and probably stickers or something too
 
+
* refactoring the redshirts role and implementation
* MORE STUFF
+
* rainbow grocery's consensus and conflict mediation workshop
 +
* outreach/help/services for the disadvantaged/dwelling-impaired  (THIS IS IMPORTANT, sure we are not a homeless shelter but our structure and openness cause us to be a vector for this demographic.  i think it behooves us as an organization and as people to address this in an empathic and controlled manner.)
 +
* ensuring clean/safe facilities (bathrooms, basically, but maybe kitchen -- depends on strength of "Kitchen Working Group")
  
 
=== Possible CWG Scenarios ===
 
=== Possible CWG Scenarios ===
  
 
* hosting a dialog between people who think the kitchen promotes the use of Noisebridge as a homeless shelter versus people who use the kitchen responsibly.
 
* hosting a dialog between people who think the kitchen promotes the use of Noisebridge as a homeless shelter versus people who use the kitchen responsibly.
 +
** thinking about the kitchen existing at all: if we minimize the "dishes and pots" aspect of the kitchen, and set it up to facilitate hacking type stuff like molecular gastronomy, and add a dishwasher, it could get better.
 +
 
* addressing problematic behavior on the part of individuals and considering whether they should be referred to a separate mediation/harassment group.
 
* addressing problematic behavior on the part of individuals and considering whether they should be referred to a separate mediation/harassment group.
  
 +
Maybe (but maybe not):
  
 
+
* implementing and maintaining management software (http://spiff.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ via torrie, and https://www.loomio.org/ , and https://slack.com/  and http://www.discourse.org/
 
 
  
  
 
=== NOT in the CWG's purview ===
 
=== NOT in the CWG's purview ===
  
ensuring clean/safe facilities (bathrooms, basically, but maybe kitchen)
+
* kitchen rebuild (content/process) -- KitchenWorkingGroup should attack this one.  
 
+
* refactoring consensus process and decision negotiation (consensus is not a monolithic model, and its also complex and mutable, kinda like agile/scrum methodology.  participants in it should be informed and prepared.) http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/cbh_ch1.html
kitchen rebuild (content/process) (kitchen existing as a separate issue could work for us. if we minimize the "dishes and pots" aspect of the kitchen, and set it up to facilitate hacking type stuff like molecular gastronomy, and add a dishwasher, it could get better)
 
 
 
refactoring consensus process and decision negotiation (consensus is not a monolithic model, and its also complex and mutable, kinda like agile/scrum methodology.  participants in it should be informed and prepared.) http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/cbh_ch1.html
 
 
 
 
 
refactoring the redshirts role and implementation
 
 
 
implementing and maintaining management software (http://spiff.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ via torrie, and https://www.loomio.org/ , and https://slack.com/  and http://www.discourse.org/
 
 
 
 
 
separate mailing list(s) for members only, and for the working group
 
  
hosting for services (where, who pays, etc)
 
  
rainbow grocery's consensus and conflict mediation workshop
+
=== Daravinne, what does this mean? ===
  
outreach/help/services for the disadvantaged/dwelling-impaired  (THIS IS IMPORTANT, sure we are not a homeless shelter but our structure and openness cause us to be a vector for this demographic.  i think it behooves us as an organization and as people to address this in an empathic and controlled manner.)
+
* hosting for services (where, who pays, etc)

Revision as of 00:17, 4 April 2014

Bringing the Noisebridge community together to create a better space for all.

The goal of the Community Working Group is to solve problems as a group that we have historically failed to solve as individuals.

For example:

  • keeping the space clean and physically safe.
  • resolving interpersonal conflicts before they become "drama".
  • maintaining commonly used facilities by delegating responsiblity (and making sure to award recognition!)
  • hosting social events that encourage greater connectedness, without putting extra pressure on the space.


The CWG may spin off subgroups as needed or desired, groups which can expect no "control" from its parent group, but which should probably check in from time to time. The idea should always be to keep the community informally informed of all of the goings-on at Noisebridge. See also FractalWorkingGroup

Working Group Members

User:Daravinne

User:Nthmost

.....need moar members


On the Philosophy of Resolving Conflicts

We'd like to see people as individuals worthy of continued participation in Noisebridge, even when they make mistakes. We believe that misunderstandings happen, and that no one is perfect. We believe that the vast majority of people have good intentions and really just want to hack!

We also believe that harassment is a serious problem and not to be taken lightly. So while some disagreements may be treated as minor interpersonal misunderstandings, some should be referred out to another group specifically set up to handle harassment. (User:flamsmark is working on this group)

Finally, we agree that certain behaviors -- particularly sleeping in the space and drug use -- can endanger our relationship with our landlord and jeopardize our lease. We hope to be able to refer individuals to local hostels, clinics, and shelters to assist them, rather than having them use Noisebridge as a halfway house or having Noisebridge throw them out.


Working Group Meetings

schedule goes here, also links to meeting notes


Possible CWG Projects

  • making a New Member Packet containing info about processes, participation, etc, and probably stickers or something too
  • refactoring the redshirts role and implementation
  • rainbow grocery's consensus and conflict mediation workshop
  • outreach/help/services for the disadvantaged/dwelling-impaired (THIS IS IMPORTANT, sure we are not a homeless shelter but our structure and openness cause us to be a vector for this demographic. i think it behooves us as an organization and as people to address this in an empathic and controlled manner.)
  • ensuring clean/safe facilities (bathrooms, basically, but maybe kitchen -- depends on strength of "Kitchen Working Group")

Possible CWG Scenarios

  • hosting a dialog between people who think the kitchen promotes the use of Noisebridge as a homeless shelter versus people who use the kitchen responsibly.
    • thinking about the kitchen existing at all: if we minimize the "dishes and pots" aspect of the kitchen, and set it up to facilitate hacking type stuff like molecular gastronomy, and add a dishwasher, it could get better.
  • addressing problematic behavior on the part of individuals and considering whether they should be referred to a separate mediation/harassment group.

Maybe (but maybe not):


NOT in the CWG's purview

  • kitchen rebuild (content/process) -- KitchenWorkingGroup should attack this one.
  • refactoring consensus process and decision negotiation (consensus is not a monolithic model, and its also complex and mutable, kinda like agile/scrum methodology. participants in it should be informed and prepared.) http://web.mit.edu/publicdisputes/practice/cbh_ch1.html


Daravinne, what does this mean?

  • hosting for services (where, who pays, etc)