Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(57 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{meetings}}
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.


Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the [[Draft Consensus Items]] page, instead?
You might be looking for
 
* the [[Draft Consensus Items]] page, instead? If your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with.
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
* [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.


{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
|-
|-
| Date First Discussed [[XX Month, Year]]
| Date First Discussed [[XX Month, Year]]
| Proposed By [[User:User|User]]
| Proposed By [[User:User|User]]
| Informal Title
| Informal Summary Title
| Summary
| Body of Motion
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
|-
|-


|-
|-
| August 24th, 2021
| April 23, 2024
| Fineline
| Proposed By [[User:User|Elle]]
| COVID-19 vaccination requirement; honor system preferred
| Pool of money for sewing room reforms
| For the next 90 days unless explicitly renewed by fresh Consensus:
| (Body of Motion goes here) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1e0AYfBecatCktmdX1SKm2KpBXIZAYTuEUwy6M1r3kls/edit#gid=0
| Author of this Record [[User:MoofSoup|moof]]
|-


|-
| September 5th, 2023
| proposed by [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
| 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew
| Renewing May 23rd Consensus Item
REVIEWING as of Feb 27th, 2024
Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good.


It is excellent to broach the subject of vaccination, whether by pointing at the sign, or asking the person if they are vaccinated. If people are unvaccinated they must not be let inside without very good reason. It is unexcellent to ask for vaccine cards unless there is a strong reason.
This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week.  
 
|Author of this record: [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
|-


|-
|-
| September 21, 2021
| March 12th, 2024
| Fnord
| proposed by [[User:LX|LX]]
| COVID-19 vaccination requirement; honor system preferred
| Consensus to 86 [[User:Gssp|Benjamin]].
| For the next 90 days unless explicitly renewed by fresh Consensus:
|
When taking appropriate responsibility for introducing a new person into the physical space, it is expected that vaccination status may be explicitly discussed (briefly and respectfully) to communicate the clear Consensus of Noisebridge that for safety of all participants, people not currently vaccinated against COVID-19 may not be permitted to come inside without good reason for any exception.
| Author of this Record: [[User:Mcint|Loren]]
|-


Respecting preference for anonymity and discouraging pointless "papers please" scenarios should generally preclude checking vaccine cards and especially any associated demands for identification without good reason for any exception (such as special events or legal requirements).
| ɲ
|


<!--
|-
|-
| MONTH DAY, YEAR
| March 12th, 2024
| NAME/NYM
| proposed by [[User:LX|LX]]
| TITLE
| Consensus to 86 Fromsa.
| SUMMARY
|  
| AUTHOR(s)
| Author of this Record: [[User:Mcint|Loren]]
|-
|-
-->
 
 
!
!
!
!
!
 


<!-- open consensus item with meeting discussion for over two weeks, no blocks, rolling back to draft for further illumination
<!-- open consensus item with meeting discussion for over two weeks, no blocks, rolling back to draft for further illumination
Line 53: Line 67:
| Fiscal Sponsorship for noisebridge.space project & Party == ON
| Fiscal Sponsorship for noisebridge.space project & Party == ON
| ɲ
| ɲ
|
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
-->
-->


|}
|}

Latest revision as of 20:17, 23 April 2024

Noisebridge | About | Visit | 272 | Manual | Contact | Guilds | Resources | Events | Projects | 5MoF | Meetings | Donate | (Edit)
Meetings | Process Meeting Template | Discussion Meeting Template | Archive | Metaguild Archive | Current Consensus Items | Consensus History | Announcements | Facilitation | Note-taking | (Edit)

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

You might be looking for

  • the Draft Consensus Items page, instead? If your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with.
  • Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
Date First Discussed XX Month, Year Proposed By User Informal Summary Title Body of Motion Author of this Record User
April 23, 2024 Proposed By Elle Pool of money for sewing room reforms (Body of Motion goes here) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1e0AYfBecatCktmdX1SKm2KpBXIZAYTuEUwy6M1r3kls/edit#gid=0 Author of this Record moof
September 5th, 2023 proposed by Mark 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew Renewing May 23rd Consensus Item

REVIEWING as of Feb 27th, 2024 Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good.

This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week.

Author of this record: Mark
March 12th, 2024 proposed by LX Consensus to 86 Benjamin. Author of this Record: Loren
March 12th, 2024 proposed by LX Consensus to 86 Fromsa. Author of this Record: Loren


Retrieved from "https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Current_Consensus_Items&oldid=82973"