Current Consensus Items

From Noisebridge
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(update election items)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
|2012-01-17
 
|2012-01-17
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
|In the case of a tie between Noisebridge board candidates, we will have a lottery among the tied persons.
+
|In the case of a tie between the election of Noisebridge board candidates, we will use a Roshimbo tournament between said parties to decide.
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 22:08, 24 January 2012

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Wording Author of this Record
2012-01-03 Tom That the conditions under which Noisebridge membership expires be expressed more clearly and simply. Danny
2012-01-17 Leif Noisebridge should use the approval voting process for Board elections. Leif
2012-01-17 Leif In the case of a tie between the election of Noisebridge board candidates, we will use a Roshimbo tournament between said parties to decide. Leif
Personal tools