Current Consensus Items

From Noisebridge
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(update election items)
(42 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
{| border="1"
 
{| border="1"
! Date First Discussed
+
! Date First Discussed  
 
! Proposed By
 
! Proposed By
 
! Wording
 
! Wording
 
! Author of this Record
 
! Author of this Record
 
|-
 
|-
|2012-01-03
 
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|That the conditions under which Noisebridge membership expires be expressed more clearly and simply.
 
|[[User:Malaclyps|Danny]]
 
|-
 
|2012-01-17
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|Noisebridge should use the approval voting process for Board elections.
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|-
 
|2012-01-17
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|In the case of a tie between Noisebridge board candidates, we will have a lottery among the tied persons.
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
 
|}
 

Revision as of 21:41, 20 November 2012

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Wording Author of this Record
Personal tools