Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
(22 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
|-
| April 30 2013
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_07_23|7/23]]  
| [[User:Reverend_Mik|Reverend Mik]]
|Martin
| that Noisebridge send Form CT-NRP-1 to the California Attorney General with a $20 check so that we as an organization are in compliance with California law, and require the treasurer to compile and submit the annual report to Attorney General's office as specified in the applicable case law. (original email with details here https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2013-April/036577.html )
|Brandon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. He is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community.
| [[User:Reverend_Mik|Reverend Mik]]
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]
|-
|-
}
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_07_23|7/23]]
|James
|Create a formal process for re-admitting people into the community. The exact process will be presented.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_06_18|6/18]] - Deferred 07/09/2013 to clarify wording
|Monad
|Some issues need to be fleshed out by a meeting of interested parties. They can identify the central points that require consensus during the weekly meeting.
|Casey

Revision as of 20:07, 30 July 2013

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Wording Author of this Record
7/23 Martin Brandon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. He is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. Jarrod
7/23 James Create a formal process for re-admitting people into the community. The exact process will be presented. Jarrod
6/18 - Deferred 07/09/2013 to clarify wording Monad Some issues need to be fleshed out by a meeting of interested parties. They can identify the central points that require consensus during the weekly meeting. Casey
Retrieved from "https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Current_Consensus_Items&oldid=33348"