Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! Wording | ! Wording | ||
! Author of this Record | ! Author of this Record | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 23: | Line 16: | ||
| The moderator of the weekly meeting should ask if people think that the prior weeks meeting notes are accurate and sufficient. (I invite amendments to the language - the purpose is to avoid confusion and shadow the procedure in formal meetings to approve the prior meetings minutes) | | The moderator of the weekly meeting should ask if people think that the prior weeks meeting notes are accurate and sufficient. (I invite amendments to the language - the purpose is to avoid confusion and shadow the procedure in formal meetings to approve the prior meetings minutes) | ||
| [[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] | | [[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2014-02-09 | | 2014-02-09 | ||
Line 32: | Line 22: | ||
| Pidgeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. They are prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. | | Pidgeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. They are prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. | ||
| [[User:MadCap|Robin]] | | [[User:MadCap|Robin]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2014-01-21 (discussed? not in meeting notes) | | 2014-01-21 (discussed? not in meeting notes) | ||
Line 39: | Line 27: | ||
| Ban Lee Sonko | | Ban Lee Sonko | ||
| Lee Sonko is unwelcome at Noisebridge. He is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. | | Lee Sonko is unwelcome at Noisebridge. He is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. | ||
| [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]] | | [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 66: | Line 42: | ||
| 2014-1-8 | | 2014-1-8 | ||
| [[User:AlSweigart|Al]] | | [[User:AlSweigart|Al]] | ||
| Ban Dan | | ''In mediation'' Ban Dan | ||
| Mediation complete. Mediators: Praveen, Madelynn. | | Mediation complete. Mediators: Praveen, Madelynn. | ||
Line 74: | Line 50: | ||
|2013-12-10 | |2013-12-10 | ||
|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]] | |[[User:Bfb|Kevin]] | ||
| Expiration period for associate member policy | | ''Tabled until details are elaborated'' Expiration period for associate member policy | ||
|Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days | |Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days to the consensus decision [[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_29#Proposal_to_create_an_Associate_Member_role_and_limit_access_to_Noisebridge_24.2F7_to_Member.2C_Associate_Member_and_thoes_hosted_by_M_and_AM|to create new Member role]]. All subsequent mutations of the original consensus should be brought for a second consensus. If no consensus can be reached, Noisebridge will revert to being open to the public. | ||
|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]] | |[[User:Bfb|Kevin]] | ||
Revision as of 21:22, 11 February 2014
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
Date First Discussed | Proposed By | Informal Title | Wording | Author of this Record |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014-02-10 | Greg | Ask if notes are okay? | The moderator of the weekly meeting should ask if people think that the prior weeks meeting notes are accurate and sufficient. (I invite amendments to the language - the purpose is to avoid confusion and shadow the procedure in formal meetings to approve the prior meetings minutes) | Greg |
2014-02-09 | Robin | Ban Pidgeon | Pidgeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. They are prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. | Robin |
2014-01-21 (discussed? not in meeting notes) | Tom | Ban Lee Sonko | Lee Sonko is unwelcome at Noisebridge. He is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. | Tom |
2014-1-9 | Dana | Consensus process change | 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member stand-asides or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.
2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy. 3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished. |
Dana |
2014-1-8 | Al | In mediation Ban Dan | Mediation complete. Mediators: Praveen, Madelynn.
Ban Dan from the space for a pattern of verbal abuse against Al. |
Al |
2013-12-10 | Kevin | Tabled until details are elaborated Expiration period for associate member policy | Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days to the consensus decision to create new Member role. All subsequent mutations of the original consensus should be brought for a second consensus. If no consensus can be reached, Noisebridge will revert to being open to the public. | Kevin |