Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(fixing the date on my consensus proposal)
(267 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


{| border="1"
{| border="1"
! Date First Discussed
! Date First Discussed  
! Proposed By
! Proposed By
! Wording
! Informal Title
! Summary and pull request.
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
|-
|2012-01-03
| 2013-04-22
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
| [[User:nthmost|Naomi]]
|That the conditions under which Noisebridge membership expires be expressed more clearly and simply. (3 of 4 items related to this passed; one is still pending)
| revert to Member / associate member structure for recognized forms of NB participation.
|[[User:Malaclyps|Danny]]
| bureaucracy Pull Request #35
| [[User:nthmost|Naomi]]
|-
|-
| 2013-03-24
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
| Revoke Tom's council privileges
| Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item.
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
|-
|-
|2012-01-31
|[[User:SuperQ|SuperQ]]
|That Noisebridge reimburse Mr SuperQ for the remainder ofthe cost of the wire trays, after donations this week. (Wire trays cost $930, donations so far $100)
|}

Revision as of 14:56, 23 April 2014

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary and pull request. Author of this Record
2013-04-22 Naomi revert to Member / associate member structure for recognized forms of NB participation. bureaucracy Pull Request #35 Naomi
2013-03-24 Kevin Revoke Tom's council privileges Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item. Kevin