Current Consensus Items

From Noisebridge
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (edited to reflect actuality of Membership situation (no more "council membership"))
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
! Summary and pull request.
 
! Summary and pull request.
 
! Author of this Record
 
! Author of this Record
|-
 
| 2014-05-20
 
| [[User:JeffreyATW|Jeffrey]] via [[User:Jake|Jake]]
 
| Improve wording about associate membership.
 
|  What was consensed as
 
 
  "Noisebridge's space shall be open only to members and associate members
 
  at any time. A member or associate member may at any time invite a person
 
  into Noisebridge and host that person at Noisebridge as long as that
 
  member or associate member remains at Noisebridge. No other person shall
 
  be permitted at Noisebridge at any other time."
 
 
should be changed to
 
 
  "Noisebridge is open to Members, Associate Members, and guests sponsored
 
  by same, at all times.  Any person who is not one of the above may be
 
  asked to leave if no Member or Associate Member present wishes to sponsor
 
  them at that time, with no other justification being necessary.
 
 
 
  People coming to Noisebridge who don't know anyone should be introduced
 
  to members who are present so that sponsorship can occur if members
 
  present choose to do so at that time.  Noisebridge should present itself
 
  as "open to public visitors and guests as often as possible"
 
| [[User:JeffreyATW|Jeffrey]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-05-20
 
| [[User:nthmost|Naomi]]
 
| Rescind Consensus Item about wiki tokens.
 
| Members should not be forced to identify themselves on the public wiki. NB has a paper Member folder for a good reason. The Secretary's primary job is to maintain the accuracy of the Member List; public (i.e. extra-Noisebridge) identification must not be required for the Secretary to do this job.  Relevant consensus item passed at [[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12]] and begins with "It shall not a secret..."
 
| [[User:nthmost|Naomi]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2014-03-24
 
| 2014-03-24
 
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
 
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
| Revoke Tom's council privileges
+
| Revoke Tom Lowenthal's Membership
| Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item. -- revisited on 2013/05/13 based on tangential concerns relating to Tom's position as Secretary ([[https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_05_13#Proposal_to_Revoke_Tom_Lowenthal.27s_Membership see notes]]); if Tom can't come to a meeting, then Casey, Ron, and/or Madelynn need to either stand aside or propose a way to satisfy community's concerns.
+
| Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item. -- revisited on 2014/05/13 based on tangential concerns relating to Tom's position as Secretary ([[https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_05_13#Proposal_to_Revoke_Tom_Lowenthal.27s_Membership see notes]]); if Tom can't come to a meeting, then Casey, Ron, and/or Madelynn need to either stand aside or propose a way to satisfy community's concerns.
 
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
 
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 13:31, 28 July 2014

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary and pull request. Author of this Record
2014-03-24 Kevin Revoke Tom Lowenthal's Membership Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item. -- revisited on 2014/05/13 based on tangential concerns relating to Tom's position as Secretary ([see notes]); if Tom can't come to a meeting, then Casey, Ron, and/or Madelynn need to either stand aside or propose a way to satisfy community's concerns. Kevin
Personal tools