Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Remove consensed items)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
! Proposed By
! Proposed By
! Informal Title
! Informal Title
! Summary and pull request.
! Summary
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
| 13 March 2018
| @augur
| Safe Space Update
| Modify the safe space policy as follows:
Replace the word "member" in the last line with "community participant". The line changes from this:
 
  "People violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled from the space or the event at the discretion of any Noisebridge member."
 
to this:
 
  "People violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled from the space or the event at the discretion of any Noisebridge community participant."
 
The purpose of this change is to bring the wording of the consensus proposal in line with the original intent of the proposal, from when the notion of "member" was different, and in line with current practice.
| @augur
|}
|}

Revision as of 20:33, 13 March 2018

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary Author of this Record
13 March 2018 @augur Safe Space Update Modify the safe space policy as follows:

Replace the word "member" in the last line with "community participant". The line changes from this:

 "People violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled from the space or the event at the discretion of any Noisebridge member."
 

to this:

 "People violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled from the space or the event at the discretion of any Noisebridge community participant."
 

The purpose of this change is to bring the wording of the consensus proposal in line with the original intent of the proposal, from when the notion of "member" was different, and in line with current practice.

@augur