Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Updated)
m (updated to reflect summary title, and text of motion)
 
(359 intermediate revisions by 80 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{meetings}}
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.


The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
You might be looking for
* the [[Draft Consensus Items]] page, instead? If your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with.
* [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.


{| border="1"
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
! Date First Discussed
! Proposed By
! Informal Title
! Wording
! Author of this Record


|-
|-
| 2014-02-11
| Date First Discussed [[XX Month, Year]]
| [[User:Qbit|Qbit]]
| Proposed By [[User:User|User]]
| Request to amend ballot
| Informal Summary Title
| Request to append [[User:Qbit|Qbit]] to the BoD election ballot. I made the deadline of the 4th, but I didn't have computer access prior to the meeting, so was unable to add my name before consensus was reached on the list of nominees. I messaged ahead to [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]] before the meeting started to let him know I was on the way and requested he inform [[User:BfB|BfB]], Chair of the election committee.
| Body of Motion
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
|-


Background: I began my scientific career at [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0X_HDSQXMI0 Starlab], a multidisciplinary "Deep Future" research institute which focused on advanced research that offers significant long-term potential impact for humanity. Leading 500 upcoming diplomats as Chairman for the UNISCA First Committee on Disarmament and International Security. Currently leading 160 PhD-level scientists, researchers and engineers as Director of the Board and Chief Science Officer for the [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0H9qb9GHxM world's first commercial astronaut corps].  
|-
| [[User:Qbit|Qbit]]
| September 5th, 2023
| proposed by [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
| 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew
| Renewing May 23rd Consensus Item
REVIEWING as of Feb 27th, 2024
Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good.


This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week.
|Author of this record: [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
|-
|-
| 2014-02-10
| [[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]]
| Ask if notes are okay?
| The moderator of the weekly meeting should ask if people think that the prior weeks meeting notes are accurate and sufficient. (I invite amendments to the language - the purpose is to avoid confusion and shadow the procedure in formal meetings to approve the prior meetings minutes)
| [[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]]


|-
|-
| 2014-02-09
| March 12th, 2024
| [[User:MadCap|Robin]]
| proposed by [[User:LX|LX]]
| Ban Pidgeon
| Consensus to 86 [[User:Gssp|Benjamin]].
| Pidgeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. They are prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community.
|  
| [[User:MadCap|Robin]]
| Author of this Record: [[User:Mcint|Loren]]
|-




|-
|-
| 2014-01-21 (discussed? not in meeting notes)
| March 12th, 2024
| [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]]
| proposed by [[User:LX|LX]]
| Ban Lee Sonko
| Consensus to 86 Fromsa.
| Lee Sonko is unwelcome at Noisebridge. He is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community.
|  
| [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]]
| Author of this Record: [[User:Mcint|Loren]]
|-
|-
| 2014-01-21 (discussed? not in meeting notes)
| [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]]
| Ban E. Clair Bandersnatch
| E. Clair Bandersnatch is unwelcome at Noisebridge. She is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community.
| [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]]
|-
| 2014-01-21
| [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]]
| Git repo for policy
| The canonical location for Noisebridge policies and processes shall be a git repository. The canonical process to modify these policies and processes shall be the merging of a proposed changed version. The desicion to merge a patch shall be made by Noisebridge's consensus process. The most recent version of all such policies and procedures shall also be posted at an appropriate page on the Noisebridge wiki. It shall be the responsibility of the Secretary to operate and maintain this system.
| [[User:Flamsmark|Tom]]
|-
| 2014-1-9
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
| Consensus process change
| 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member [http://www.cohousing.org/popups/gp_blocks.htm stand-asides] or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.


2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy.


3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished.
!
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
!
|-
!
|-
!
| 2014-1-8
!
| [[User:AlSweigart|Al]]
 
| Ban Dan
| Mediation complete. Mediators: Praveen, Madelynn.


Ban Dan from the space for a pattern of verbal abuse against Al.
<!-- open consensus item with meeting discussion for over two weeks, no blocks, rolling back to draft for further illumination
| [[User:AlSweigart|Al]]
|-
|-
|2013-12-10
| February 16th, MMXXI
|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]]
| Ⅹ
| Expiration period for associate member policy
| Be excellent to each other.
|Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days, beginning October 29, 2013, to the consensus decision [[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_29#Proposal_to_create_an_Associate_Member_role_and_limit_access_to_Noisebridge_24.2F7_to_Member.2C_Associate_Member_and_thoes_hosted_by_M_and_AM|to create an Associate Member role]]. All subsequent mutations of the original consensus should be brought for a second consensus, beginning February 4, 2014. If no consensus can be reached, Noisebridge will revert to being open to the public all day, every day.
| Fiscal Sponsorship for noisebridge.space project & Party == ON
|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]]
| ɲ
|-
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
| 2013-12-10
-->
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom Lowenthal]]
| Membership renaming
| Renaming the category “Noisebridge Members” to the “Noisebridge Council”, and renaming the category “Associate Members” to “Noisebridge Members”. This change extends not only to our operations, but also to our bylaws, so that the effect is only a change of name but does not change the rights or privileges of any person or category of people.
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom Lowenthal]]
|-
| 2014-01-21
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
| No changes to consensus proposals
| Proposals shall only be elegible to reach consensus in a weekly meeting in the exact form that they were agreed at a previous weekly meeting. Items shall not be elegible for consensus unless they were recorded on the Current Consensus Items page on the Noisebridge wiki before 24 hours have passed after the end of the weekly meeting in which they were proposed. If a proposal is modified at a weekly meeting, it shall not be elegible for consensus at that meeting.
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_19|2013-11-19]]
|[[User:Jerkey|Jake]]
| Members-only wording change
|Jake proposes a change to the previous consensus agreement regarding access to Noisebridge. (originally posted 2013/11/4 to discuss)
 
Replace:
<blockquote>Noisebridge's space shall be open only to members and associate members at any time. A member or associate member may at any time invite a person into Noisebridge and host that person at Noisebridge as long as that member or associate member remains at Noisebridge. No other person shall be permitted at Noisebridge at any other time.</blockquote>


with:
|}
<blockquote>Noisebridge is open to Members, Associate Members, and guests sponsored by same, at all times. Any person who is not one of the above may be asked to leave if no Member or Associate Member present wishes to sponsor them at that time, with no other justification being necessary.</blockquote>
<blockquote>People coming to Noisebridge who don't know anyone should be introduced to members who are present so that sponsorship can occur if members present choose to do so at that time. Noisebridge should present itself as "open to public visitors and guests as often as possible".</blockquote>
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]

Latest revision as of 20:01, 19 March 2024

Noisebridge | About | Visit | 272 | Manual | Contact | Guilds | Resources | Events | Projects | 5MoF | Meetings | Donate | (Edit)
Meetings | Process Meeting Template | Discussion Meeting Template | Archive | Metaguild Archive | Current Consensus Items | Consensus History | Announcements | Facilitation | Note-taking | (Edit)

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

You might be looking for

  • the Draft Consensus Items page, instead? If your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with.
  • Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
Date First Discussed XX Month, Year Proposed By User Informal Summary Title Body of Motion Author of this Record User
September 5th, 2023 proposed by Mark 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew Renewing May 23rd Consensus Item

REVIEWING as of Feb 27th, 2024 Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good.

This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week.

Author of this record: Mark
March 12th, 2024 proposed by LX Consensus to 86 Benjamin. Author of this Record: Loren
March 12th, 2024 proposed by LX Consensus to 86 Fromsa. Author of this Record: Loren


Retrieved from "https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Current_Consensus_Items&oldid=82853"