Difference between revisions of "Current Consensus Items"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Dates)
 
(180 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
 
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
 +
 +
Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the [[Draft Consensus Items]] page, instead?
  
 
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
 
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
  
{| border="1"
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
 
! Date First Discussed  
 
! Date First Discussed  
 
! Proposed By
 
! Proposed By
 
! Informal Title
 
! Informal Title
! Summary and pull request.
+
! Summary
 
! Author of this Record
 
! Author of this Record
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
|fill
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
|me
| House rules
+
|in
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/9 Pull request.] Highlights:
+
|thank
* We have a thing about telling people to leave.
+
|you
* Noisebridge is your hackerspace, not your home.
 
* The basement, roof and fire escape are out of bounds.
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
|09/10/19
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
|Ryan Sternlicht
| Ban [[User:N0_Hat|Josh]]
+
|Approve New Lease When it is given to us
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/8 Pull request.]
+
|
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
* Noisebridge is currently negotiating a new lease, and it needs to be approved very soon,  
|-
+
*here is some info on the current discussion
| 2014-02-18
+
*Tyler-One priority I have is removing the elevator clause from the lease. As it stands, NoiseBridge is responsible for 100% of the first $10,000 of repairs, and then 50% thereafter. There is no upper limit to the potential cost here. We are currently being billed $10,000 for the last elevator repair.
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
*Tyler-For the month of September, Brian has told us to continue to pay $6,500
| Ban kyle, johnny, kara
+
*Tyler-My original request was a 5 year lease, same rate, without the elevator clause) but Brian was not interested.
| Ban kyle, johnny, kara from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior.
+
*Tyler-His response was $7,250 to remove the elevator fee. I countered at $7.0k
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
*Tyler-He replied with $7,000 for a 2 year lease without the elevator cost.
|-
+
*Tyler-I asked for more then 2 years. Brian responded with 3 years at $7,100 / month.
| 2014-02-18
+
*Tyler-As it stands, I have countered with $7,000 for 2 years with a 2 year option at $7,250.
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
 
| Ban Robin
+
*Per Jarrod - it is really hard to justify large future costs (Zoning fee, sprinklers / second egress, etc.) if we are potentially limited by a short lease. I'd like to push for a longer term lease, but it would likely come with additional rent hikes.  
| Ban Robin from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior.
 
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-18
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
| Only members can join the council.
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/4 Pull Request]. This also includes some clarifying re-structuring of the membership and council descriptions.
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-18
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
| Publish member list in our policies git repo.
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/3 Github issue]
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-11
 
| [[User:MadCap|Robin]]
 
| Ban Pidgeon
 
| Pidgeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. They are prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community.
 
| [[User:MadCap|Robin]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-01-09
 
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
 
| Consensus process change
 
| 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member [http://www.cohousing.org/popups/gp_blocks.htm stand-asides] or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.
 
  
2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy.
+
*Looking for any and all opinions.  
  
3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished.
+
*
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
+
*I think we should decide whether to approve the board and treasurer to finalize and approve a new lease as soon as we get terms that are favorable to the general noisebridge community
 +
*
 +
*
 +
|Ryan Sternlicht
 
|-
 
|-
|2013-12-10
+
|09/10/19
|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]]
+
|Ryan Sternlicht
| ''Tabled until details are elaborated'' Expiration period for associate member policy
+
|Purchace new Laser Tube
|Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days to the consensus decision [[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_29#Proposal_to_create_an_Associate_Member_role_and_limit_access_to_Noisebridge_24.2F7_to_Member.2C_Associate_Member_and_thoes_hosted_by_M_and_AM|to create new Member role]]. All subsequent mutations of the original consensus should be brought for a second consensus. If no consensus can be reached, Noisebridge will revert to being open to the public.
+
|
|[[User:Bfb|Kevin]]
+
*Our laser cutter is broken, we need a new tube
 +
*a new tube costs around 1400 dollars, should we spend noisebridge money to buy a new tube
 +
*we use the machine a lot, and we should discuss if we want the 100 watt or 150 watt tube replacment
 +
*I think we should decide and then approve the purchase of a new laser tube.
 +
|Ryan Sternlicht
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
UPDATE THIS CONSENSUS ITEM APPROPRIATELY.

Latest revision as of 02:29, 11 September 2019

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the Draft Consensus Items page, instead?

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary Author of this Record
fill me in thank you
09/10/19 Ryan Sternlicht Approve New Lease When it is given to us
  • Noisebridge is currently negotiating a new lease, and it needs to be approved very soon,
  • here is some info on the current discussion
  • Tyler-One priority I have is removing the elevator clause from the lease. As it stands, NoiseBridge is responsible for 100% of the first $10,000 of repairs, and then 50% thereafter. There is no upper limit to the potential cost here. We are currently being billed $10,000 for the last elevator repair.
  • Tyler-For the month of September, Brian has told us to continue to pay $6,500
  • Tyler-My original request was a 5 year lease, same rate, without the elevator clause) but Brian was not interested.
  • Tyler-His response was $7,250 to remove the elevator fee. I countered at $7.0k
  • Tyler-He replied with $7,000 for a 2 year lease without the elevator cost.
  • Tyler-I asked for more then 2 years. Brian responded with 3 years at $7,100 / month.
  • Tyler-As it stands, I have countered with $7,000 for 2 years with a 2 year option at $7,250.
  • Per Jarrod - it is really hard to justify large future costs (Zoning fee, sprinklers / second egress, etc.) if we are potentially limited by a short lease. I'd like to push for a longer term lease, but it would likely come with additional rent hikes.
  • Looking for any and all opinions.
  • I think we should decide whether to approve the board and treasurer to finalize and approve a new lease as soon as we get terms that are favorable to the general noisebridge community
Ryan Sternlicht
09/10/19 Ryan Sternlicht Purchace new Laser Tube
  • Our laser cutter is broken, we need a new tube
  • a new tube costs around 1400 dollars, should we spend noisebridge money to buy a new tube
  • we use the machine a lot, and we should discuss if we want the 100 watt or 150 watt tube replacment
  • I think we should decide and then approve the purchase of a new laser tube.
Ryan Sternlicht

UPDATE THIS CONSENSUS ITEM APPROPRIATELY.