Difference between revisions of "Current Consensus Items"

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Update consensus)
 
(292 intermediate revisions by 65 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{meetings}}
 
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
 
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
 +
 +
Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the [[Draft Consensus Items]] page, instead?
  
 
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
 
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
  
{| border="1"
+
 
! Date First Discussed
+
 
! Proposed By
+
 
! Informal Title
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
! Summary and pull request.
+
 
! Author of this Record
 
 
|-
 
|-
| [[User:N0_Hat|Josh]]
+
| Date First Discussed [[XX Month, Year]]
| Ban [[User:flamsmark|Tom]].  Pattern of abusive authoritarian behavior.
+
| Proposed By [[User:User|User]]
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/12 Pull request.]
+
| Informal Title
| [[User:No_Hat|Josh]]
+
| Summary
-
+
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
| 2014-02-24
 
| [[User:bfb]]
 
| Affirm policies in git repo
 
| Noisebridge affirms the [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy bureaucracy repository master branch] accurately represents the current state of Noisebridge consensus as of ${DATE}. [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/11 Pull Request]
 
| [[User:bfb]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
 
| [[User:Neurotech1|John]]
+
 
| RAYC Temporary ban for 6 Months.
 
| RAYC is instructed to take a break from NB. Therefore he is prohibited from entering the physical building of 2169 Mission st. for 6 Months.
 
| [[User:Neurotech1|John]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
| First discussed: February 21,2023
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
| [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
| House rules
+
| CONSENSUS OR DEMONSTRATED EFFORT TO FIND A GOOD LOVING HOME FOR EXPENSIVE EQUIPMENT BEFORE WASTE DISPOSAL
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/9 Pull request.] Highlights:
+
|
* We have a thing about telling people to leave.
+
 
* Noisebridge is your hackerspace, not your home.
+
Expensive equipment should go through the 2 week big-c consensus process or have a demonstrated good-faith effort made to find a good loving home for it before it is gotten rid of through waste disposal.  An example might be a piece of equipment worth over $20,000 USD when it was new. This is both out of respect and to save the reputation of Noisebridge for future donation of expensive equipment... Something something a reasonable publicly documented effort to reach project/tool owner must be established so as to comply with this procedure.
* The basement, roof and fire escape are out of bounds.
+
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
NOTE: This has been tabled from Feb 28 meeting in favor of private apology / accountability.
 +
 
 +
| [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
<!-- open consensus item with meeting discussion for over two weeks, no blocks, rolling back to draft for further illumination
| Ban [[User:N0_Hat|Josh]]
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/8 Pull request.]
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-18
+
| February 16th, MMXXI
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
|
| Ban kyle, johnny, kara
+
| Be excellent to each other.
| Ban kyle, johnny, kara from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior.
+
| Fiscal Sponsorship for noisebridge.space project & Party == ON
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
| ɲ
|-
+
|
| 2014-02-18
+
-->
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
 
| Ban Robin
 
| Ban Robin from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior. 
 
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-18
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
| Only members can join the council.
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/4 Pull Request]. This also includes some clarifying re-structuring of the membership and council descriptions.
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-18
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
| Publish member list in our policies git repo.
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/3 Github issue]
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-11
 
| General
 
| Ban RAYC
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/7 Pull request.]
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-01-09
 
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
 
| Consensus process change
 
| 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member [http://www.cohousing.org/popups/gp_blocks.htm stand-asides] or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.
 
 
 
2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy.
 
  
3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished.
+
|}
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
 
|-
 

Latest revision as of 04:39, 1 March 2023

Noisebridge | About | Visit | 272 | Manual | Contact | Guilds | Resources | Events | Projects | 5MoF | Meetings | Donate | (Edit)
Meetings | Template | Archive | Metaguild Archive | Current Consensus Items | Consensus History | Announcements | Facilitation | Note-taking | Edit

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the Draft Consensus Items page, instead?

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.



Date First Discussed XX Month, Year Proposed By User Informal Title Summary Author of this Record User
First discussed: February 21,2023 Mark CONSENSUS OR DEMONSTRATED EFFORT TO FIND A GOOD LOVING HOME FOR EXPENSIVE EQUIPMENT BEFORE WASTE DISPOSAL

Expensive equipment should go through the 2 week big-c consensus process or have a demonstrated good-faith effort made to find a good loving home for it before it is gotten rid of through waste disposal. An example might be a piece of equipment worth over $20,000 USD when it was new. This is both out of respect and to save the reputation of Noisebridge for future donation of expensive equipment... Something something a reasonable publicly documented effort to reach project/tool owner must be established so as to comply with this procedure.

NOTE: This has been tabled from Feb 28 meeting in favor of private apology / accountability.

Mark