Difference between revisions of "Current Consensus Items"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
(fix formatting)
(Fixing the door was consensed.)
 
(283 intermediate revisions by 61 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{meetings}}
 
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
 
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
 +
 +
Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the [[Draft Consensus Items]] page, instead?
  
 
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
 
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
  
{| border="1"
+
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
! Date First Discussed
+
 
! Proposed By
 
! Informal Title
 
! Summary and pull request.
 
! Author of this Record
 
 
|-
 
|-
| [[User:N0_Hat|Josh]]
+
| Date First Discussed [[XX Month, Year]]
| Ban [[User:flamsmark|Tom]].  Pattern of abusive authoritarian behavior.
+
| Proposed By [[User:User|User]]
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/12 Pull request.]
+
| Informal Title
| [[User:No_Hat|Josh]]
+
| Summary
 +
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-24
+
 
| [[User:bfb]]
 
| Affirm policies in git repo
 
| Noisebridge affirms the [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy bureaucracy repository master branch] accurately represents the current state of Noisebridge consensus as of ${DATE}. [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/11 Pull Request]
 
| [[User:bfb]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
| May 10, 2022
| [[User:Neurotech1|John]]
+
| Mwillson
| RAYC Temporary ban for 6 Months.
+
| COVID-19 vaccination requirement; honor system preferred
| RAYC is instructed to take a break from NB. Therefore he is prohibited from entering the physical building of 2169 Mission st. for 6 Months.
+
| Until explicitly undone by fresh Consensus:
| [[User:Neurotech1|John]]
+
 
 +
When taking appropriate responsibility for introducing a new person into the physical space, it is expected that vaccination status may be explicitly discussed (briefly and respectfully) to communicate the clear Consensus of Noisebridge that for safety of all participants, people not currently vaccinated against COVID-19 may not be permitted to come inside without good reason for any exception.
 +
 
 +
Respecting preference for anonymity and discouraging pointless "papers please" scenarios should generally preclude checking vaccine cards and especially any associated demands for identification without good reason for any exception (such as special events or legal requirements).
 +
| [[User:Mwillson|Mwillson]]
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
<!--
| House rules
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/9 Pull request.] Highlights:
 
* We have a thing about telling people to leave.
 
* Noisebridge is your hackerspace, not your home.
 
* The basement, roof and fire escape are out of bounds.
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-25
+
| MONTH DAY, YEAR
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
| NAME/NYM
| Ban [[User:N0_Hat|Josh]]
+
| TITLE
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/8 Pull request.]
+
| SUMMARY
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
+
| AUTHOR(s)
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-18
+
-->
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
 
| Ban kyle, johnny, kara
+
<!-- open consensus item with meeting discussion for over two weeks, no blocks, rolling back to draft for further illumination
| Ban kyle, johnny, kara from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior. 
 
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014-02-18
+
| February 16th, MMXXI
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
|
| Ban Robin
+
| Be excellent to each other.
| Ban Robin from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior. 
+
| Fiscal Sponsorship for noisebridge.space project & Party == ON
| [[User:N0_Hat|N0_Hat]]
+
| ɲ
|-
+
|
| 2014-02-18
+
-->
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
| Only members can join the council.
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/4 Pull Request]. This also includes some clarifying re-structuring of the membership and council descriptions.
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-18
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
| Publish member list in our policies git repo.
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/3 Github issue]
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-11
 
| General
 
| Ban RAYC
 
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/7 Pull request.]
 
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
| 2014-01-09
 
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
 
| Consensus process change
 
| 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member [http://www.cohousing.org/popups/gp_blocks.htm stand-asides] or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.
 
  
2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy.
+
|}
 
 
3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished.
 
| [[User:Dana|Dana]]
 
|-
 

Latest revision as of 03:31, 25 May 2022

Noisebridge | About | Visit | 272 | Manual | Contact | Guilds | Stuff | Events | Projects | 5MoF | Meetings | Donate | E
Meetings | Template | Archive | Current Consensus Items | Consensus History | Announcements | Facilitation | Note-taking | Edit

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

Is your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with? Perhaps it belongs on the Draft Consensus Items page, instead?

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed XX Month, Year Proposed By User Informal Title Summary Author of this Record User
May 10, 2022 Mwillson COVID-19 vaccination requirement; honor system preferred Until explicitly undone by fresh Consensus:

When taking appropriate responsibility for introducing a new person into the physical space, it is expected that vaccination status may be explicitly discussed (briefly and respectfully) to communicate the clear Consensus of Noisebridge that for safety of all participants, people not currently vaccinated against COVID-19 may not be permitted to come inside without good reason for any exception.

Respecting preference for anonymity and discouraging pointless "papers please" scenarios should generally preclude checking vaccine cards and especially any associated demands for identification without good reason for any exception (such as special events or legal requirements).

Mwillson