Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added slack log publishing / privacy consensus proposal)
No edit summary
 
(209 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{meetings}}
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.


The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
You might be looking for
* the [[Draft Consensus Items]] page, instead? If your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with.
* [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.


{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
! Date First Discussed  
|-
! Proposed By
| Date First Discussed [[XX Month, Year]]
! Informal Title
| Proposed By [[User:User|User]]
! Summary
| Informal Summary Title
! Author of this Record
| Body of Motion
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
|-


|-
|-
| 22 May 2018
| April 23, 2024
| Beka
| Proposed By [[User:User|Elle]]
| Philanthropy Renaming
| Pool of money for sewing room reforms
| Rename Philanthropists to Daemons and update all the relevant related words in parallel ways.
| (Body of Motion goes here) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1e0AYfBecatCktmdX1SKm2KpBXIZAYTuEUwy6M1r3kls/edit#gid=0
| Beka
| Author of this Record [[User:MoofSoup|moof]]
|-


|-
|-
| 22 May 2018
| September 5th, 2023
| Beka
| proposed by [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
| Document and Do-ocratize Infrastructure
| 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew
| Noisebridge will document it's infrastructure (including access control, wikipedia and social media accounts, domain names, financial record keeping and related accounts), and build tools to reduce or eliminate the reliance on trusted individuals, so as to prevent those items of infrastructure from becoming unusable or unmaintainable in the case that those trusted individuals cease to be readily contactable. All such tools will aim to maximize decentralized do-ocratic participation, transparency, and accountability, and minimize secrecy and concentration of power. As part of this, it is necessary to answer the following questions:
| Renewing May 23rd Consensus Item
1) How can these pieces of infrastructure be accessed without significant vulnerabilities? I.E. what does it mean to access NB's Twitter account in an accountable way? How does that compare to bank information? To domain names? What conditions are appropriate for each such piece of infrastructure, to allow access to working groups building tools?
REVIEWING as of Feb 27th, 2024
Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good.


2) What tools can be made to provide decentralizeddo-ocratic control and accountability? What information must be shared, when, and how can that sharing be guaranteed?
This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week.
|Author of this record: [[User:Mwillson|Mark]]
|-


3) Who will build the tools, write the documentation, etc.?
|-
| March 12th, 2024
| proposed by [[User:LX|LX]]
| Consensus to 86 [[User:Gssp|Benjamin]].
|
| Author of this Record: [[User:Mcint|Loren]]
|-


When these three questions can be answered, access will be granted to these tools. The system of trusted individuals may continue to exist as a fallback, if desirable, but will not be the sole way to manage this infrastructure thereafter.


| Beka
|-
| March 12th, 2024
| proposed by [[User:LX|LX]]
| Consensus to 86 Fromsa.
|
| Author of this Record: [[User:Mcint|Loren]]
|-




!
!
!
!
!


<!-- open consensus item with meeting discussion for over two weeks, no blocks, rolling back to draft for further illumination
|-
|-
| 22 May 2018
| February 16th, MMXXI
| Trent
| Ⅹ
| Publish Slack Logs Going Forwards; Respect Privacy of Slack Logs Before June 2018
| Be excellent to each other.
| Publish monthly slack logs on the internet moving forwards. Slack history before June 2018 is not to be shared without further Consensus.
| Fiscal Sponsorship for noisebridge.space project & Party == ON
| Trent
| ɲ
 
| Author of this Record [[User:User|User]]
 
-->


|}
|}

Latest revision as of 20:17, 23 April 2024

Noisebridge | About | Visit | 272 | Manual | Contact | Guilds | Resources | Events | Projects | 5MoF | Meetings | Donate | (Edit)
Meetings | Process Meeting Template | Discussion Meeting Template | Archive | Metaguild Archive | Current Consensus Items | Consensus History | Announcements | Facilitation | Note-taking | (Edit)

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

You might be looking for

  • the Draft Consensus Items page, instead? If your consensus item still drafty, in need of much revision, and not something that you think people already can more or less agree with.
  • Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
Date First Discussed XX Month, Year Proposed By User Informal Summary Title Body of Motion Author of this Record User
April 23, 2024 Proposed By Elle Pool of money for sewing room reforms (Body of Motion goes here) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1e0AYfBecatCktmdX1SKm2KpBXIZAYTuEUwy6M1r3kls/edit#gid=0 Author of this Record moof
September 5th, 2023 proposed by Mark 2 member block -- for only freeform motions -- temporary 3 month effect, renew Renewing May 23rd Consensus Item

REVIEWING as of Feb 27th, 2024 Updating blocking requirement for big C consensus items from 1 to 2 people. Currently in order to block a big C consensus Item, we need only 1 member to block. Would like to update this number to 2 members. Perhaps the 1 member to block made sense when the community was tiny. It doesn't make sense anymore in our much larger community. If you cant convince anyone else to block with you, then maybe you just have bad ideas. The community should not have to make changes only folks with bad ideas think are good.

This change would be provisional for 3 months [from May 23, 2023]. Also would only apply for member proposed consensus items, non-member proposed consensus items would still be block able by a single member. Also only 1 member would be required to block new membership. Also if any one member would like to block, but cannot because they are alone, they can request a 1 week hold to defer decision for an additional 3rd week.

Author of this record: Mark
March 12th, 2024 proposed by LX Consensus to 86 Benjamin. Author of this Record: Loren
March 12th, 2024 proposed by LX Consensus to 86 Fromsa. Author of this Record: Loren


Retrieved from "https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Current_Consensus_Items&oldid=82973"