Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(fix formatting)
Line 14: Line 14:
| [ Pull request.]
| [ Pull request.]
| [[User:No_Hat|Josh]]
| [[User:No_Hat|Josh]]
| 2014-02-24
| 2014-02-24
| [[User:bfb]]
| [[User:bfb]]

Revision as of 03:07, 26 February 2014

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary and pull request. Author of this Record
Josh Ban Tom. Pattern of abusive authoritarian behavior. Pull request. Josh
2014-02-24 User:bfb Affirm policies in git repo Noisebridge affirms the bureaucracy repository master branch accurately represents the current state of Noisebridge consensus as of ${DATE}. Pull Request User:bfb
2014-02-25 John RAYC Temporary ban for 6 Months. RAYC is instructed to take a break from NB. Therefore he is prohibited from entering the physical building of 2169 Mission st. for 6 Months. John
2014-02-25 Tom House rules Pull request. Highlights:
  • We have a thing about telling people to leave.
  • Noisebridge is your hackerspace, not your home.
  • The basement, roof and fire escape are out of bounds.
2014-02-25 Tom Ban Josh Pull request. Tom
2014-02-18 N0_Hat Ban kyle, johnny, kara Ban kyle, johnny, kara from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior. N0_Hat
2014-02-18 N0_Hat Ban Robin Ban Robin from the space for reoccurring pattern of abusive behavior. N0_Hat
2014-02-18 Tom Only members can join the council. Pull Request. This also includes some clarifying re-structuring of the membership and council descriptions. Tom
2014-02-18 Tom Publish member list in our policies git repo. Github issue Tom
2014-02-11 General Ban RAYC Pull request. Tom
2014-01-09 Dana Consensus process change 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member stand-asides or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.

2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy.

3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished.