HInternet/Meetings: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Undo revision 14120 by 203.111.229.246 (Talk))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
>= September 18, 2010 =
= September 18, 2010 =


It was determined that Noisebridge probably doesn't have line-of-sight to the Alameda endpoint, so no packets were sent over the link.  A Ubiquiti Nanostation 5 was provisioned and a parabolic antenna installed in Alameda to gather noiselevel statistics between 4.9-6 GHz.  Elevation plots for Mt. Diablo were computed and it seems that there may be LoS between Mt. Diablo and Alameda.
It was determined that Noisebridge probably doesn't have line-of-sight to the Alameda endpoint, so no packets were sent over the link.  A Ubiquiti Nanostation 5 was provisioned and a parabolic antenna installed in Alameda to gather noiselevel statistics between 4.9-6 GHz.  Elevation plots for Mt. Diablo were computed and it seems that there may be LoS between Mt. Diablo and Alameda.
----
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
----
=[http://ivowunuqu.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]=
----
=[http://ivowunuqu.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
----
</div>

Latest revision as of 00:14, 19 November 2010

September 18, 2010[edit]

It was determined that Noisebridge probably doesn't have line-of-sight to the Alameda endpoint, so no packets were sent over the link. A Ubiquiti Nanostation 5 was provisioned and a parabolic antenna installed in Alameda to gather noiselevel statistics between 4.9-6 GHz. Elevation plots for Mt. Diablo were computed and it seems that there may be LoS between Mt. Diablo and Alameda.