Machine Learning Meetup Notes:2011-4-13: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
*Chess rating competition: build a new rating system that more accurately produces the results. The performance still plateaued, but took longer.
*Chess rating competition: build a new rating system that more accurately produces the results. The performance still plateaued, but took longer.
*Most users of kaggle are from computer science and statistics, followed by economics, math, biostats.
*Most users of kaggle are from computer science and statistics, followed by economics, math, biostats.
*Tools people use:
**R
**Matlab
**SAS
**Weka
**SPSS
**Python

Revision as of 20:17, 13 April 2011

Anthony Goldbloom from Kaggle Visits

  • Guy used random forests to win HIV competition. Word "random forests" is trademarked. Dude taught himself machine learning from watching youtube videos. Random forests are pretty robust to new data.
    • Used caret package in R to deal with random forests.
  • Kaggle splits test dataset into two, uses half for leaderboard.
  • Often score difference between winning model and second place is not statistically significant. So they award prizes to top few. Might impose restrictions on execution time of model.
  • Performance bottoms out in competitions within a few weeks in general. This seems to be due to all the information being "squeezed" out of the dataset at that point.
  • Chess rating competition: build a new rating system that more accurately produces the results. The performance still plateaued, but took longer.
  • Most users of kaggle are from computer science and statistics, followed by economics, math, biostats.
  • Tools people use:
    • R
    • Matlab
    • SAS
    • Weka
    • SPSS
    • Python