Editing Meeting Notes 2011 03 01

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 413: Line 413:
  
 
Danny: Just to be clear, Patrick gets the same (very thin) level of protection
 
Danny: Just to be clear, Patrick gets the same (very thin) level of protection
in these notes as afforded any other Noisebridger, which is that it is
+
in these notes as afforded any other Noisebridge member, which is that it is
 
first name only. We also went to some effort to make the evidence
 
first name only. We also went to some effort to make the evidence
 
non-googleable to protect the privacy of Patrick and the other people involved.
 
non-googleable to protect the privacy of Patrick and the other people involved.
Line 422: Line 422:
  
 
DrJesus: To bar Patrick from entering the space and participating in the
 
DrJesus: To bar Patrick from entering the space and participating in the
community. [Note-taker: note the full consensus item includes Patrick's full
+
community. [Recorder: note the full consensus item includes Patrick's full
name, and is recorded elsewhere in the [[Consensus_Items_History|consensus items history]].]
+
name, and is recorded in the [[Consensus_Items_History|consensus items history]].]
  
(Discussion about whether and to what extent the consensus item can be altered on the fly. Consensus is that we can change it within reason to reflect the actual consensus without resetting the whole process, and that a one word change falls under this traditional flexibility)
+
(Discussion about whether and to what extent the consensus item can be changed. Consensus is that we can change it within reason to reflect the actual consensus without resetting the whole process, and that a one word change falls under this tradition)
  
Glen(?): Just wish to add to the notes my sense that this is for major
+
John: Just wish to add to the notes my sense that this is for major
 
non-excellence without willingness to reform.
 
non-excellence without willingness to reform.
  
 
Claudia: I was harassed, but it's good for us to work together to ensure that
 
Claudia: I was harassed, but it's good for us to work together to ensure that
he can reform, improve, get a job and the support he needs.
+
he can reform, improve, get a job, support he needs.
  
Glen(?): I think it's appropriate that we all aim to be helpful to Patrick.  
+
John: I think it's appropriate that we all aim to be helpful to Patrick.  
  
 
Rubin: I would like to note that if you notice anyone shit-talking about
 
Rubin: I would like to note that if you notice anyone shit-talking about

Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)