Editing Meeting Notes 2012 05 29

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
= Instructions =
* '''Delete these instructions section before posting completed minutes.'''
* Pick a moderator and a note-taker.
* Optionally: pick a membership-binder-wrangler; otherwise the moderator can take care of it.
== Note-taker ==
* Open a text editor to take notes on the major points of the meeting, using this page at the template.
* Project the draft meeting notes and agenda in real time throughout the meeting.
* Edit the [[Current_Consensus_Items|Current Consensus Items]] if anything is proposed for consensus next week.
* Edit the [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] if anything was reached consensus or failed to reach consensus this week.
* Post the meeting notes to this page, and email out a summary with a link.
* Tell treasurer@noisebridge.net and secretary@noisebridge.net if there are new members.
== Moderator==
* Understand the structure of Noisebridge [[consensus|decision-making]]
* Make sure everyone gets a chance to speak.
* Speak only minimally yourself.
* Keep the meeting moving, and avoid getting bogged down.
* Identify discussion items, arrange times limits for talking about each item.
* Identify and summarize consensus, suggest things that need to be done.
* '''Get the [[membership binder]] and ensure that it is returned safely.'''
== Participants ==
* Say your name before you talk.
* Remain on-topic, and speak as concisely as possible.
* Assist the note-taker with any links or corrections that are needed.
* Remain respectful of other participants, their time, and the consensus and moderation process.
= Agenda =
= Agenda =


[https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The 218th Meeting of Noisebridge]
[https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The 218th Meeting of Noisebridge]


Note-taker: [[User:Malaclyps Malaclyps]]
Note-taker: FIXME YOUR NAME HERE


Moderator: [[User:Miloh Miloh]]
Moderator: FIXME THEIR NAME HERE
   
   
== Introduction and Names ==
== Introduction and Names ==
Line 14: Line 42:
* Introduce any new or unusual moderation techniques that you may be using during the meeting like: direct responses, limited speaking time, orderless stack, &c.
* Introduce any new or unusual moderation techniques that you may be using during the meeting like: direct responses, limited speaking time, orderless stack, &c.
* Round of introductions (remember, announcements come later):
* Round of introductions (remember, announcements come later):
 
** What's your name,  
* Snail
** are you a member,
* Tom, fights for the user
** what do you do, and
* Leif, really likes the go stones
** if you are new: how did you hear about Noisebridge?
* Cobalt, I fight against a user
* Will, I fight for the Operating System
* Zephyr fights for the interrupt vector table
* Danny, he is editing this page
* Erica, first time at Noisebridge
* Dave, builds robots
* Halley, do etextiles
* Mike, technowandering
* Claudia, how to use a sub template for wordpress
* adam, web dev
* Eric, pina coladas
* Nick, is here
* Liz, 3D printing
* Kevin
* Dana, working arduino based irrigation system
* Jake, working on various radiation hazards
* Daniella, juuuust a memmmmmber of
* Consenso, I will one day rule you all
* Juli, just discovered community
* Michel, sociologist writing a book on hackerspaces, especially noisebridge
* Kim, crowdsource democracy


== Short Announcements ==
== Short Announcements ==
* Cool new projects? Something you'd like people to know? Say now, but keep it short!
* Cool new projects? Something you'd like people to know? Say now, but keep it short!
* Any happenings at the space of which members should be made aware.
* Any happenings at the space of which members should be made aware.


* New Free School at 3265 17th Street, teaching Franch 4-6. Saturdays 12-4 bike workshop, so they're going to take the overflow.
== New or Stale Events ==
 
* Is there anything new happening at the space?
* Mozilla is kicking off a summer of coding to teach people how to develop for the web. We're kicking it off in a couple of weekends time. 24th June, starting at 3pm -- we're having a party RIGHT HERE. Meet people, find projects. Any questions ask Tom.
* Is there anything that has stopped happening at the space?
 
* If this is the first meeting of the month, review all the [[Category:Events | events at the space]] and try to weed out stale events.
* Corey talks about his project partly fnded by a exploratorium grant. It's a walking robot with a native ecosystem on its back.
 
* Danny announces that social-engineering is going to be devoted to Consenso building.


*'''24-June-2012, Sunday''', 15:00: Mozilla [[Webmakers]] Hackjam: Kicking off [https://webmaker.org/ Mozilla's Summer Web Party] for Webmakers with a hack jam. Learn about the Webmakers project and the Summer Code party, discover the power of the web, and see how you can put your [[Frontend Web Development]] skills to good use!
*'''24-June-2012, Sunday''', 15:00: Mozilla [[Webmakers]] Hackjam: Kicking off [https://webmaker.org/ Mozilla's Summer Web Party] for Webmakers with a hack jam. Learn about the Webmakers project and the Summer Code party, discover the power of the web, and see how you can put your [[Frontend Web Development]] skills to good use!
Line 68: Line 70:


== Financial Report ==
== Financial Report ==
* Funds in bank: $18125.77 -- lower than we would like.
* Funds in bank:
* NoiseTor $2165.20
* Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):


== Consensus items ==
== Consensus items ==
Line 86: Line 88:
== Discussion Items ==
== Discussion Items ==


* Rob 2.0
If an item of discussion drags on too long, further discussion may be postponed until after the meeting ends.
 
Cobalt says that Rob 2.0 only deals with people on IRC.
Jake says Rob said that Mitch said he could come to the space. We clarify that Mitch has not said anything of the sort to Rob.
 
Cobalt says: we did do mediation, me and Kelly, I felt that he got an idea of
what was going on. I don't know if he necessarily was comfortable going
forward. I didn't have time. From Rob's point of view, he's not a sketchy dude. I consider myself a social engineer and a creepy dude. I've dealt with Rob 2.0. In my personal opinion, we've had worse issues.
 
Tom says: So, about six months ago, Noisebridge reached consensus that Rob 2.0
was not welcome in the space pending mediation. Since that time, he has been
unable to conclude any effective mediation. Kelly has not made attempts at
mediation, and despite recently considering her being a non-neutral moderator,
has not made attempts to find a new moderator. Despite being unwelcome at
Noisebridge, he's repeatedly turned up. That combination of defying the
consensus and failing to make meaningful attempts to fix the problems.
 
Monad proposes that it not be permanent, but based on him doing something to
remediate himself.
 
Danny points out we've put in a "until further notice" in the last banning to cover this eventuality. He'll look at the historical record to find out what the langage was.
 
Kelly says that she had a few phone calls, and he was paranoid and
uncooperative. Any time she tried to discuss his actual behavior. His favourite topic was Rubin stealing his rack. We explained that was within the parameters of Noisebridge.
 
Miloh says a ban doesn't change his actual behaviour.
 
Tom thinks a ban needs to be a stronger statement to help fix the behaviour.
 
Will says he can corroborate what Kelly says: he is very averse to talking about his own behaviour.
 
Jake said that Rob turned up 3.30am, and I told Rob he had to go, and he tried
to talk his way out of it. I asked him are you refusing to leave. And he left.
He was saying "What's your problem with you? Who are you to represent the whole hackerspace". It will make it very clear to him.
 
Kelly stated that Rob responded with rob us, hack "our shit", get the police
involved. Kelly does not want to be mediator.
 
* Criminousness. Danny would like to point out that you shouldn't conduct criminal activities on Noisebridge, and to do so there is a general consensus that it befits an insta-banning.
 
* Miloh has been receiving donations on behalf of Noisebridge, that would be  then sold for Noisebridge funds. Kelly is uncomfortable with this. The treasurer hasn't verified it. Kelly is worried about obligations. If it comes in with cash, it's very simple. If it comes in with kind, disposing is not an easy. Kelly's principle concern is that she's not competent.


* Miloh offers to pay for a CPA. Danny suggests working with Internet Archive.
During discussion, it is not necessary to write down exact what each person says. Record the topics of discussion, and any items of consensus or controversy here. Detailed descriptions of the conversation should go on the discuss page for this meeting.


== End of Meeting ==
== End of Meeting ==
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)