Editing Meeting Notes 2013 12 17
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
These are the notes from the [https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The 293rd Meeting of Noisebridge]. Note-taker: Jarrod; Moderator: Tom. | These are the notes from the [https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The 293rd Meeting of Noisebridge]. Note-taker: Jarrod; Moderator: Tom. | ||
* ''' | * '''One or two bullet points of high-level meeting summary.''' | ||
= Short announcements and events = | = Short announcements and events = | ||
* Mark: Algorithms 1 - A group is getting together on January 31st to beef up on algorithms using Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/ | * Mark: Algorithms 1 - A group is getting together on January 31st to beef up on algorithms using Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/ | ||
* Danny: 5mof is taking a Holiday break | * Danny: 5mof is taking a Holiday break | ||
= [[ Membership Binder ]] = | = [[ Membership Binder ]] = | ||
Sam Tepper - 4+ | Sam Tepper - 4+ | ||
Line 48: | Line 40: | ||
Robin leaves, discussion ensues.... | Robin leaves, discussion ensues.... | ||
Consensed. Robin is a member! Clap! | Consensed. Robin is a member! Clap! | ||
= Financial Report = | = Financial Report = | ||
Line 71: | Line 51: | ||
Robin: Interested in discussing a means to secure storage in the space. | Robin: Interested in discussing a means to secure storage in the space. | ||
Tom suggests a straw poll to determine which proposals we can discuss tonight. Not all items may end up being discussed | Tom suggests a straw poll to determine which proposals we can discuss tonight. Not all items may end up being discussed. | ||
A. Jake: Jake proposes a change to the previous consensus agreement regarding access to Noisebridge. | A. Jake: Jake proposes a change to the previous consensus agreement regarding access to Noisebridge. | ||
Line 107: | Line 87: | ||
Tom. Okay Straw Poll. (recorded numbers are note- | Tom. Okay Straw Poll. (recorded numbers are note-takers and may not be consistent with moderators) | ||
A - 2 | A - 2 | ||
Line 147: | Line 127: | ||
Any substantial objections? Madelyn: AV Needs, how will we set this up before it happens. Robin: We have a policy of taking pictures only with permission. I would like to hear more about how this will be dealt with. Greg: How will interaction with streaming users be handled. Mischeif: We have had the equipment to solve this in the past, at least the audio. Josh: could peolpe just state their handle before they speak? Madelyn: we can figure this out, but the accountability must be dealt with. Jarrod: Why is audio important? Danny: It isn't really needed I will update the language | Any substantial objections? Madelyn: AV Needs, how will we set this up before it happens. Robin: We have a policy of taking pictures only with permission. I would like to hear more about how this will be dealt with. Greg: How will interaction with streaming users be handled. Mischeif: We have had the equipment to solve this in the past, at least the audio. Josh: could peolpe just state their handle before they speak? Madelyn: we can figure this out, but the accountability must be dealt with. Jarrod: Why is audio important? Danny: It isn't really needed I will update the language | ||
''Madelynn/Al: 1) This proposal will come into effect after the 2014 board election is decided. 2) The board elections will be held on the last Tuesday in January. Nominations by members will begin 30 days before the election (for 2014, this is January 1st). Nominations will close 21 days before the election (for 2014, this is January 10th). 3) This proposal would abandon consensus as the decision-making process used by Noisebridge. In its place Noisebridge will adhere to Noisebridge's existing bylaws: acts of the board directors will be decided by majority vote of the board, decisions submitted to the membership will be decided by majority vote of the membership, including decisions for accepting or rejection membership applications. The full bylaws are available at: https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Bylaws 4) All current associate members will be converted to full members, and the associate membership role will be abolished. 5) Board directors must be members in good standing.'' | ''Madelynn/Al: 1) This proposal will come into effect after the 2014 board election is decided. | ||
2) The board elections will be held on the last Tuesday in January. Nominations by members will begin 30 days before the election (for 2014, this is January 1st). Nominations will close 21 days before the election (for 2014, this is January 10th). | |||
3) This proposal would abandon consensus as the decision-making process used by Noisebridge. In its place Noisebridge will adhere to Noisebridge's existing bylaws: acts of the board directors will be decided by majority vote of the board, decisions submitted to the membership will be decided by majority vote of the membership, including decisions for accepting or rejection membership applications. The full bylaws are available at: https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Bylaws | |||
4) All current associate members will be converted to full members, and the associate membership role will be abolished. | |||
5) Board directors must be members in good standing.'' | |||
Operate by having the board make decisions. Outlined in consensus items. | Operate by having the board make decisions. Outlined in consensus items. |