Editing Meeting Notes 2014 04 01

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
You should read the [[meeting instructions]] forthwith!<br>
Don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.
These are the notes from the [https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The XXXth Meeting of Noisebridge]. Note-taker: FIXME YOUR NAME HERE; Moderator: FIXME THEIR NAME HERE.
* '''One or two bullet points of high-level meeting summary.'''
= Short announcements and events =
* Bullet point list of announcements and events
= [[ Membership Binder ]] =
= [[ Membership Binder ]] =
* Hephestus
* The name of the applicant, the week of their application, and their sponsors.
* Kate K
* Qbit


= Financial Report =
= Financial Report =
* Funds in bank: $29,281
* Funds in bank:
* Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):
* Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):


Line 12: Line 19:
== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] ==
== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] ==
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
=== House Rules/Community Agreements/Fair Use ===
Needs greater summary
=== Semi-publish Member List ===
Sent back for rewording for clarity <br>
--Language regarding identity <br>
--What information will be shared? <br>
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/19 Pull Request]
=== Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages ===
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process <br>
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom <br>
--Rewriting consensus history: [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 N0_Hat ] <br>
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement <br>
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. <br>
Consensus was blocked in favor of continuing this discussion when Tom is able to be present. <br>
=== Revert banning of N0_Hat ===
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 Pull Request ]
==== Consensus ====


== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
Line 40: Line 25:
= Discussion Notes =
= Discussion Notes =


Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion <br>
        Like to have specific thread for specific proposals
        Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making
        We can write our own software too
        Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already
        Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise
        Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss
        Remove certain bad actors occassionally
        New contributors are moderated
        Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter
        Could have moderated and unmoderated list
What's up with the community working group?
        In it's idea format [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/22 Pull request]
        Let's just do it too.
        Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space
        AI for online dispute resolution environment
        Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'
Systemic problem with disenfranchisement
        The way we do things needs to change
        More time, more advantage
        Find a solution where everyone can participate
Process hack-a-thon
Rainbow Grocery offers professional mediation training for non-profits


= Attendance =
= Attendance =
* Ron
* List of names and short summary. For bonus points, link wiki user pages.
* Gregg
* JC
* Kevin
* Jon
* Dale
* Brandon
* Christopher
* Steve
* Jarod
* Dana
* Norman
* Xavier
* Monad
* Bill
* Carlos
* Casey
* Daravinne
* Nthmost


[[Category:Meeting Notes]]
[[Category:Meeting Notes]]
Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.
Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from "https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Meeting_Notes_2014_04_01"