Editing Meeting Notes 2014 04 01
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You should read the [[meeting instructions]] forthwith!<br> | |||
Don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary. | |||
These are the notes from the [https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The 307th Meeting of Noisebridge]. Note-taker: Kevin; Moderator: Daravinne. | |||
* '''One or two bullet points of high-level meeting summary.''' | |||
= Short announcements and events = | |||
* 5mof 3rd Thursday - 5 minute lightening talks, we take submissions. http://5mof.net | |||
= [[ Membership Binder ]] = | = [[ Membership Binder ]] = | ||
* Hephestus | * Hephestus | ||
| Line 17: | Line 26: | ||
=== Semi-publish Member List === | === Semi-publish Member List === | ||
Sent back for rewording for clarity <br> | Sent back for rewording for clarity </br> | ||
--Language regarding identity <br> | --Language regarding identity </br> | ||
--What information will be shared? <br> | --What information will be shared? </br> | ||
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/19 | [Pull Request https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/19] | ||
=== Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages === | === Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages === | ||
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process <br> | --Pattern of abuse of the consensus process </br> | ||
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom <br> | --Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom </br> | ||
--Rewriting consensus history: [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 | --Rewriting consensus history: [N0_Hat https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26] </br> | ||
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement <br> | --Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement </br> | ||
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. <br> | --James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. </br> | ||
We will continue this discussion when Tom is able to be present at a meeting. </br> | |||
=== Revert banning of N0_Hat === | === Revert banning of N0_Hat === | ||
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 | [Pull Request https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26] | ||
==== Consensus ==== | ==== Consensus ==== | ||
| Line 40: | Line 49: | ||
= Discussion Notes = | = Discussion Notes = | ||
Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion <br> | Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion </br> | ||
Like to have specific thread for specific proposals | |||
Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making | |||
We can write our own software too | |||
Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already | |||
Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise | |||
Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss | |||
Remove certain bad actors occassionally | |||
New contributors are moderated | |||
Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter | |||
Could have moderated and unmoderated list | |||
What's up with the community working group? | What's up with the community working group? | ||
In it's idea format [Pull request https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/22] | |||
Let's just do it too. | |||
Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space | |||
AI for online dispute resolution environment | |||
Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic' | |||
Systemic problem with disenfranchisement | Systemic problem with disenfranchisement | ||
The way we do things needs to change | |||
More time, more advantage | |||
Find a solution where everyone can participate | |||
Process hack-a-thon | Process hack-a-thon | ||