Difference between revisions of "Meeting Notes 2014 04 01"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Secretaribot says its time for the XXXth Noisebridge notes)
 
m (fixed my name)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
You should read the [[meeting instructions]] forthwith!<br>
 
Don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.
 
 
These are the notes from the [https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The XXXth Meeting of Noisebridge]. Note-taker: FIXME YOUR NAME HERE; Moderator: FIXME THEIR NAME HERE.
 
* '''One or two bullet points of high-level meeting summary.'''
 
 
= Short announcements and events =
 
* Bullet point list of announcements and events
 
 
 
= [[ Membership Binder ]] =
 
= [[ Membership Binder ]] =
* The name of the applicant, the week of their application, and their sponsors.
+
* Hephestus
 +
* Kate K
 +
* Qbit
  
 
= Financial Report =
 
= Financial Report =
* Funds in bank:
+
* Funds in bank: $29,281
 
* Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):
 
* Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):
  
Line 19: Line 12:
 
== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] ==
 
== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] ==
 
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
 
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
 +
 +
=== House Rules/Community Agreements/Fair Use ===
 +
Needs greater summary
 +
 +
=== Semi-publish Member List ===
 +
Sent back for rewording for clarity <br>
 +
--Language regarding identity <br>
 +
--What information will be shared? <br>
 +
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/19 Pull Request]
 +
 +
=== Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages ===
 +
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process <br>
 +
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom <br>
 +
--Rewriting consensus history: [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 N0_Hat ] <br>
 +
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement <br>
 +
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. <br>
 +
 +
Consensus was blocked in favor of continuing this discussion when Tom is able to be present. <br>
 +
 +
=== Revert banning of N0_Hat ===
 +
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 Pull Request ]
 +
==== Consensus ====
  
 
== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
 
== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
Line 25: Line 40:
 
= Discussion Notes =
 
= Discussion Notes =
  
 +
Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion <br>
 +
        Like to have specific thread for specific proposals
 +
        Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making
 +
        We can write our own software too
 +
        Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already
 +
        Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise
 +
        Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss
 +
        Remove certain bad actors occassionally
 +
        New contributors are moderated
 +
        Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter
 +
        Could have moderated and unmoderated list
 +
 +
What's up with the community working group?
 +
        In it's idea format [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/22 Pull request]
 +
        Let's just do it too.
 +
        Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space
 +
        AI for online dispute resolution environment
 +
        Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'
 +
 +
Systemic problem with disenfranchisement
 +
        The way we do things needs to change
 +
        More time, more advantage
 +
        Find a solution where everyone can participate
 +
 +
Process hack-a-thon
 +
 +
Rainbow Grocery offers professional mediation training for non-profits
  
 
= Attendance =
 
= Attendance =
* List of names and short summary. For bonus points, link wiki user pages.
+
* Ron
 +
* Gregg
 +
* JC
 +
* Kevin
 +
* Jon
 +
* Dale
 +
* Brandon
 +
* Christopher
 +
* Steve
 +
* Jarod
 +
* Dana
 +
* Norman
 +
* Xavier
 +
* Monad
 +
* Bill
 +
* Carlos
 +
* Casey
 +
* Daravinne
 +
* Nthmost
  
 
[[Category:Meeting Notes]]
 
[[Category:Meeting Notes]]
 
Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.
 
Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.

Latest revision as of 21:10, 4 April 2014

Membership Binder [edit]

  • Hephestus
  • Kate K
  • Qbit

Financial Report[edit]

Consensus items[edit]

Proposals from last week [edit]

(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the Consensus Items History page.)

House Rules/Community Agreements/Fair Use[edit]

Needs greater summary

Semi-publish Member List[edit]

Sent back for rewording for clarity
--Language regarding identity
--What information will be shared?
Pull Request

Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages[edit]

--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom
--Rewriting consensus history: N0_Hat
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation.

Consensus was blocked in favor of continuing this discussion when Tom is able to be present.

Revert banning of N0_Hat[edit]

Pull Request

Consensus[edit]

Proposals for next week [edit]

(Add any new items for consensus to the Current Consensus Items page.)

Discussion Notes[edit]

Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion

       Like to have specific thread for specific proposals
       Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making
       We can write our own software too
       Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already
       Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise
       Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss
       Remove certain bad actors occassionally
       New contributors are moderated
       Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter
       Could have moderated and unmoderated list

What's up with the community working group?

       In it's idea format Pull request
       Let's just do it too.
       Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space
       AI for online dispute resolution environment
       Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'

Systemic problem with disenfranchisement

       The way we do things needs to change
       More time, more advantage
       Find a solution where everyone can participate

Process hack-a-thon

Rainbow Grocery offers professional mediation training for non-profits

Attendance[edit]

  • Ron
  • Gregg
  • JC
  • Kevin
  • Jon
  • Dale
  • Brandon
  • Christopher
  • Steve
  • Jarod
  • Dana
  • Norman
  • Xavier
  • Monad
  • Bill
  • Carlos
  • Casey
  • Daravinne
  • Nthmost

Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.