Difference between revisions of "Meeting Notes 2014 04 01"
(→Attendance: adding myself to the attendance record)
m (fixed my name)
|Line 81:||Line 81:|
Latest revision as of 21:10, 4 April 2014
- 1 Membership Binder
- 2 Financial Report
- 3 Consensus items
- 4 Discussion Notes
- 5 Attendance
- Kate K
- Funds in bank: $29,281
- Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):
(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the Consensus Items History page.)
House Rules/Community Agreements/Fair Use
Needs greater summary
Semi-publish Member List
Sent back for rewording for clarity
--Language regarding identity
--What information will be shared?
Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom
--Rewriting consensus history: N0_Hat
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation.
Consensus was blocked in favor of continuing this discussion when Tom is able to be present.
Revert banning of N0_Hat
(Add any new items for consensus to the Current Consensus Items page.)
Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion
Like to have specific thread for specific proposals Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making We can write our own software too Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss Remove certain bad actors occassionally New contributors are moderated Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter Could have moderated and unmoderated list
What's up with the community working group?
In it's idea format Pull request Let's just do it too. Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space AI for online dispute resolution environment Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'
Systemic problem with disenfranchisement
The way we do things needs to change More time, more advantage Find a solution where everyone can participate
Rainbow Grocery offers professional mediation training for non-profits
Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.