Difference between revisions of "Meeting Notes 2014 04 01"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
You should read the [[meeting instructions]] forthwith!<br>
 
Don't forget to '''post the meeting notes to the wiki''' and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.
 
 
These are the notes from the [https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Category:Meeting_Notes The 307th Meeting of Noisebridge]. Note-taker: Kevin; Moderator: Daravinne.
 
* '''One or two bullet points of high-level meeting summary.'''
 
 
= Short announcements and events =
 
* 5mof 3rd Thursday - 5 minute lightening talks, we take submissions. http://5mof.net
 
 
 
= [[ Membership Binder ]] =
 
= [[ Membership Binder ]] =
 
* Hephestus
 
* Hephestus
Line 26: Line 17:
  
 
=== Semi-publish Member List ===
 
=== Semi-publish Member List ===
Sent back for rewording for clarity </br>
+
Sent back for rewording for clarity <br>
--Language regarding identity </br>
+
--Language regarding identity <br>
--What information will be shared? </br>
+
--What information will be shared? <br>
[Pull Request https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/19]
+
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/19 Pull Request]
  
 
=== Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages ===
 
=== Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages ===
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process </br>
+
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process <br>
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom </br>
+
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom <br>
--Rewriting consensus history: [N0_Hat https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26] </br>
+
--Rewriting consensus history: [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 N0_Hat ] <br>
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement </br>
+
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement <br>
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. </br>
+
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. <br>
  
We will continue this discussion when Tom is able to be present at a meeting. </br>
+
Consensus was blocked in favor of continuing this discussion when Tom is able to be present. <br>
  
 
=== Revert banning of N0_Hat ===
 
=== Revert banning of N0_Hat ===
[Pull Request https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26]
+
[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 Pull Request ]
 
==== Consensus ====
 
==== Consensus ====
  
Line 49: Line 40:
 
= Discussion Notes =
 
= Discussion Notes =
  
Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion </br>
+
Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion <br>
Like to have specific thread for specific proposals
+
        Like to have specific thread for specific proposals
Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making
+
        Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making
We can write our own software too
+
        We can write our own software too
Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already
+
        Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already
Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise
+
        Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise
Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss
+
        Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss
Remove certain bad actors occassionally
+
        Remove certain bad actors occassionally
New contributors are moderated
+
        New contributors are moderated
Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter
+
        Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter
Could have moderated and unmoderated list
+
        Could have moderated and unmoderated list
  
 
What's up with the community working group?
 
What's up with the community working group?
In it's idea format [Pull request https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/22]
+
        In it's idea format [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/22 Pull request]
Let's just do it too.
+
        Let's just do it too.
Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space
+
        Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space
AI for online dispute resolution environment
+
        AI for online dispute resolution environment
Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'
+
        Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'
  
 
Systemic problem with disenfranchisement
 
Systemic problem with disenfranchisement
The way we do things needs to change
+
        The way we do things needs to change
More time, more advantage
+
        More time, more advantage
Find a solution where everyone can participate
+
        Find a solution where everyone can participate
  
 
Process hack-a-thon
 
Process hack-a-thon

Revision as of 07:18, 2 April 2014

Membership Binder

  • Hephestus
  • Kate K
  • Qbit

Financial Report

Consensus items

Proposals from last week

(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the Consensus Items History page.)

House Rules/Community Agreements/Fair Use

Needs greater summary

Semi-publish Member List

Sent back for rewording for clarity
--Language regarding identity
--What information will be shared?
Pull Request

Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages

--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom
--Rewriting consensus history: N0_Hat
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation.

Consensus was blocked in favor of continuing this discussion when Tom is able to be present.

Revert banning of N0_Hat

Pull Request

Consensus

Proposals for next week

(Add any new items for consensus to the Current Consensus Items page.)

Discussion Notes

Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion

       Like to have specific thread for specific proposals
       Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making
       We can write our own software too
       Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already
       Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise
       Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss
       Remove certain bad actors occassionally
       New contributors are moderated
       Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter
       Could have moderated and unmoderated list

What's up with the community working group?

       In it's idea format Pull request
       Let's just do it too.
       Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space
       AI for online dispute resolution environment
       Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'

Systemic problem with disenfranchisement

       The way we do things needs to change
       More time, more advantage
       Find a solution where everyone can participate

Process hack-a-thon

Rainbow Grocery offers professional mediation training for non-profits

Attendance

  • Ron
  • Gregg
  • JC
  • Kevin
  • Jon
  • Dale
  • Brandon
  • Christopher
  • Steve
  • Jarod
  • Dana
  • Norman
  • Xaviar
  • Monad
  • Bill
  • Carlos
  • Casey
  • Daravinne

Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.