Editing
Meeting Notes 2022 10 04
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Discussion Item 4 == Door status? TJ wants some organization around our opening hours and stuff like that. Proposed consensus item: Current wording: - We should be open to the public as often as we can. That being said, the front gate door should be closed at all times, and it is Excellent to introduce all new Noisebridgers via tour. Because of this, Noisebridge will have open doors only when a Noisebridger is present and ready to receive. Eric - Just a side note re: access: When the light is turned on in the print shop, SHED lights up. Hmmmm Mike - I remember back when Members had a card and they had to let each person in the gate with the card. Mark - then they had to manually open the upstairs door for them and greet them. Mike - If you have a group that is meeting like in a class, they should be able to temporarily allow open access via the gate (unique code per class?) re: being too busy to answer. It is important to exercise our freedom to not answer the door all the time. TJ - I'd like to get a sense of the room, are people saying we are too closed to people generally? Are lots of people coming over and not being able to get in? Emeline - I have been around and not let people in because I was busy and in the space by myself, but these people felt entitled to come in when I looked out the window to see who it was. TJ - I've heard people talk about missing stuff at the space, and because lots of people come around and seemingly havent been greeted properly, they appear to just be wandering around. Possibly suspicious behavior. Not necessarily malicious, but there's some kinf of implication there. I don't want to put words in peoples' mouths about this though. Loren - this could be a place for guilds to step up and assign responsibilities? TJ - don't wish to solve manufactured problems - is this an actual real issue we are having? Loren - there is always the option of letting us act by not acting. I'm very sensitive to not doing work we don't have people. Mark - I think what this consensus item does is explicitly say what is excellent vs unexcellent. TJ - there historically has been no explicit guidance. But this could very well be an overreaction. (Discussion about cultural norms and what is generally considered "excellent") Conversation around this potential item will continue online
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see
Noisebridge:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Dig in!
Noisebridge
- Status: MOVED
- Donate
- ABOUT
- Accessibility
- Vision
- Blog
Manual
MANUAL
Visitors
Participation
Community Standards
Channels
Operations
Events
EVENTS
Guilds
GUILDS
- Meta
- Electronics
- Fabrication
- Games
- Music
- Library
- Neuro
- Philosophy
- Funding
- Art
- Crypto
- Documentation/Wiki
Wiki
Recent Changes
Random Page
Help
Categories
(Edit)
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information