Editing Moving/2169 Mission/challenges
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
law on ADA issues, but I do believe it will be practically useable to | law on ADA issues, but I do believe it will be practically useable to | ||
enable weelchair users to access the third floor." -from discuss list | enable weelchair users to access the third floor." -from discuss list | ||
I examined this myself. I'm not sure the call button on the ground floor is working properly, although I verified it to work on the 3rd floor. Regardless, there was a current inspection in the elevator as a passenger conveyance so it should technically comply. [[User: | I examined this myself. I'm not sure the call button on the ground floor is working properly, although I verified it to work on the 3rd floor. Regardless, there was a current inspection in the elevator as a passenger conveyance so it should technically comply. [[User:67.114.21.242|67.114.21.242]] | ||
** Building is built pre-ADA so has partial exemption. See [http://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap1toolkit.htm] "3. When Was it Built? Why Does it Matter?" and [http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=getArticle&dataId=36556]. CA law may be different, and doesn't address it as a practical/ethical question, just ADA-legal. | ** Building is built pre-ADA so has partial exemption. See [http://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap1toolkit.htm] "3. When Was it Built? Why Does it Matter?" and [http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=getArticle&dataId=36556]. CA law may be different, and doesn't address it as a practical/ethical question, just ADA-legal. |