Editing Poet to Physicist in His Laboratory
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[Poetry & Science]] | Back to [[Poetry & Science]] | ||
Line 8: | Line 5: | ||
by David Ignatow | by David Ignatow | ||
<pre style="font-family:monobook,serif;"> | <pre style="font-family:monobook,serif;"> | ||
Come out and talk to me | Come out and talk to me '''Invitation''' | ||
for then I know | for then I know | ||
into what you are shaping. | into what you are shaping. | ||
Line 18: | Line 13: | ||
I read your thoughts for a symbol: | I read your thoughts for a symbol: | ||
a movement towards an act. | a movement towards an act. | ||
I give up on thought | I give up on thought '''Rethinking''' | ||
as I see your mind | as I see your mind | ||
leading into a mystery | leading into a mystery | ||
Line 29: | Line 24: | ||
the most complex being | the most complex being | ||
convention and habit. | convention and habit. | ||
You shall form patterns | You shall form patterns '''Prescription''' | ||
of research and bind yourself | of research and bind yourself | ||
to laws within your knowledge, | to laws within your knowledge, | ||
Line 44: | Line 39: | ||
== Comments and Notes == | == Comments and Notes == | ||
This poem is an invitation to a dialogue between the speaker (a poet) and a physicist. The title and first line make this explicit: "Poet to Physicist..." and ''Come out and talk to me.'' This is an invitation for the physicist to emerge from his laboratory and engage with the poet. The speaker wants to know the "shape" of the research occurring in this laboratory; the word shape is peculiar in this context. It could be the research, as we would normally expect, or it could refer to the physicist | This poem is an invitation to a dialogue between the speaker (a poet) and a physicist. The title and first line make this explicit: "Poet to Physicist..." and ''Come out and talk to me.'' This is an invitation for the physicist to emerge from his laboratory and engage with the poet. The speaker wants to know the "shape" of the research occurring in this laboratory; the word shape is peculiar in this context. It could be the research, as we would normally expect, or it could refer to the physicist herelf, oddly enough. To the poet, the physicist's word is full of symbols and mysteries. The attempt to build a bridge from the Humanities to the Sciences, as the speaker conveys it, is an invitation but also an acknowledgement of frustration. There are mysteries, perhaps encoded in the abstract symbols of mathematics, that the poet cannot access. | ||
The dialogue quickly becomes a monologue or even a soliloquy. The physicist seems to have no voice of his own in this narrative poem. The title, then, may be more literal than it seems at first: a one-way discourse from poet to physicist caged in his cavernous and unfathomable laboratory. Initial curiosity turns into an "animus". The long final line of the poem turns into a prescriptive warning, a credo. It recalls the Church's inquiry into Galileo's innovative but heretical experiments of the heavens. This is a reactionary poet, perhaps, speaking from a position of fear and speaking with a disturbing turn of tone. We feel a growing sympathy for the unseen, voiceless physicist hemmed in from all sides. I like this poem because it is challenging and claims no simple moral agendas. | The dialogue quickly becomes a monologue or even a soliloquy. The physicist seems to have no voice of his own in this narrative poem. The title, then, may be more literal than it seems at first: a one-way discourse from poet to physicist caged in his cavernous and unfathomable laboratory. Initial curiosity turns into an "animus". The long final line of the poem turns into a prescriptive warning, a credo. It recalls the Church's inquiry into Galileo's innovative but heretical experiments of the heavens. This is a reactionary poet, perhaps, speaking from a position of fear and speaking with a disturbing turn of tone. We feel a growing sympathy for the unseen, voiceless physicist hemmed in from all sides. I like this poem because it is challenging and claims no simple moral agendas. | ||
Line 50: | Line 45: | ||
== Questions for Discussion == | == Questions for Discussion == | ||
1) What type of physicist does the poet refer to in the poem? Do you think the poet had a particular physicist in mind when he wrote the poem? | 1) What type of physicist does the poet refer to in the poem? Do you think the poet had a particular physicist in mind when he wrote the poem? | ||
Line 67: | Line 59: | ||
The Man Who Saw Through Time, Loren Eiseley. About Sir Francis Bacon, scientific visionary under Queen Elizabeth I. | The Man Who Saw Through Time, Loren Eiseley. About Sir Francis Bacon, scientific visionary under Queen Elizabeth I. | ||
Any of numerous books about Robert Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb. | Any of numerous books about Robert Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb. | ||
Genius: The life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick. About Richard Feynman, his work on the atomic bomb, and his later speculations on physics. | Genius: The life and Science of Richard Feynman, James Gleick. About Richard Feynman, his work on the atomic bomb, and his later speculations on physics. |