Difference between revisions of "Talk:Current Consensus Items"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion for Consider the Circumstances of people sleeping proposal: new section)
m ((discussion from 2014 is history))
(Tag: Replaced)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Discussion for Consider the Circumstances of people sleeping proposal ==
 
  
Consider the Circumstances When a person is found sleeping at Noisebridge, the community should consider if there are sufficient mitigating circumstance or gray areas --e.g power naps, special extenuating circumstances, etc. -- so that a sanction other than banning should be permitted.
+
== Inquiring about vaccination status ==
  
 +
Discussion for proposed consensus item: "Inquiring about vaccination status"
  
This is intended as a soft consensus item.  It recognizes that the people who are sometimes sleeping at noisebridge are someone's family, friends, former lovers.  That we should consider the circumstances of what's happening, and  try to be nice about it.
+
== Require showing vaccination cards ==
  
There are also times when someone is working on a deadline, putting in the hours, and will close their eyes-- this should be considered differently than using the space as residency type of case.
+
Discussion for proposed consensus item: "Require showing vaccination cards"
 
 
Also, the whole sleeping thing is taking so much time, hopefully a soft amendment like this one can lower some of the heat.
 
 
 
-  I'm won't be at the Tuesday meetings.  But those are some of my thoughts in proposing this language.
 

Latest revision as of 03:12, 1 September 2021

Inquiring about vaccination status[edit]

Discussion for proposed consensus item: "Inquiring about vaccination status"

Require showing vaccination cards[edit]

Discussion for proposed consensus item: "Require showing vaccination cards"