Difference between revisions of "Talk:Getting In"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
(Request for edit: new section)
(Word replacement: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[File:Circuit.jpg]]
 +
 
== Redundant edits? ==
 
== Redundant edits? ==
  
Line 18: Line 20:
  
 
This page seems to be protected. I think it would be best to have a prominent link to [[Getting Here]] at the top of the page, as it's easy to end up on this page when you're looking for directions. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete F]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 19:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 
This page seems to be protected. I think it would be best to have a prominent link to [[Getting Here]] at the top of the page, as it's easy to end up on this page when you're looking for directions. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete F]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 19:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Word replacement ==
 +
 +
"Good times to catch us our in the evenings during the week" should read "Good times to catch us are in the evenings during the week"

Latest revision as of 10:45, 2 November 2018

Circuit.jpg

Redundant edits?[edit]

Each of the edits here seem bit redundant. For example, does it need to say both "friend" and "known acquiantance"? If this is trying to be a guide, I believe the language should be as clean as possible; perfect "clarity" should be left for some legalese-like page that might be linked to.

What do you think? --gadlen (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Vouchsafe[edit]

I removed the term vouchsafed as in "properly vouchsafed guest". I could be wrong but it seems like an esoteric term that doesn't actually convey the meaning of what is going on here. Merriam-Webster says it's "to grant or furnish often in a gracious or condescending manner"

I feel that vouched for is more clear, modern and conveys the intention better. "to give a guarantee : become surety" What do you think? --gadlen (talk) 17:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Extra space[edit]

There is an extra space in "Do-ocracy -style," which should be removed. Frank (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for edit[edit]

This page seems to be protected. I think it would be best to have a prominent link to Getting Here at the top of the page, as it's easy to end up on this page when you're looking for directions. -Pete F (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Word replacement[edit]

"Good times to catch us our in the evenings during the week" should read "Good times to catch us are in the evenings during the week"