Difference between revisions of "Talk:Getting In"

From Noisebridge
Jump to: navigation, search
(Request for edit: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Redundant edits? ==
== Redundant edits? ==

Revision as of 01:15, 5 October 2016


Redundant edits?

Each of the edits here seem bit redundant. For example, does it need to say both "friend" and "known acquiantance"? If this is trying to be a guide, I believe the language should be as clean as possible; perfect "clarity" should be left for some legalese-like page that might be linked to.

What do you think? --gadlen (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)


I removed the term vouchsafed as in "properly vouchsafed guest". I could be wrong but it seems like an esoteric term that doesn't actually convey the meaning of what is going on here. Merriam-Webster says it's "to grant or furnish often in a gracious or condescending manner"

I feel that vouched for is more clear, modern and conveys the intention better. "to give a guarantee : become surety" What do you think? --gadlen (talk) 17:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Extra space

There is an extra space in "Do-ocracy -style," which should be removed. Frank (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for edit

This page seems to be protected. I think it would be best to have a prominent link to Getting Here at the top of the page, as it's easy to end up on this page when you're looking for directions. -Pete F (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)