Editing Talk:Membership/Membership Team

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
βˆ’
== Timeout/banning ==  
+
>== Timeout/banning ==  
 
Can't discuss this in person?  Discuss it here!
 
Can't discuss this in person?  Discuss it here!
  
Line 6: Line 6:
 
I think it's very important to have *some* kind of C-1 consensus process by which we can exclude a problem member from a decision.  Otherwise, one nutjob is enough to ruin the entire space, since the rest of us won't be able to do anything about it.  It doesn't matter much to me what the procedure is, as long as there is one.  If it's still extremely contentious, here's a very conservative strategy that would suffice to combat such a threat:
 
I think it's very important to have *some* kind of C-1 consensus process by which we can exclude a problem member from a decision.  Otherwise, one nutjob is enough to ruin the entire space, since the rest of us won't be able to do anything about it.  It doesn't matter much to me what the procedure is, as long as there is one.  If it's still extremely contentious, here's a very conservative strategy that would suffice to combat such a threat:
  
βˆ’
Allow a 4-week C-1 consensus (instead of the regular 2-week "everyone" consensus) for the specific purpose of removing someone's blocking privileges for the subsequent two weeks.
+
Allow a 4-week C-1 consensus (instead of the regular 2-week "everyone" consensus) for the specific purpose of removing someone's blocking privileges for the subsequent two weeks.
  
 
Hopefully that would be conservative enough to not ruffle anyone's feathers, and it would give us an out to prevent ruination, though it would take 6 weeks.
 
Hopefully that would be conservative enough to not ruffle anyone's feathers, and it would give us an out to prevent ruination, though it would take 6 weeks.
Line 12: Line 12:
 
-nils
 
-nils
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
----
 +
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 +
----
 +
=[http://ejexatul.co.cc Under Construction! Please Visit Reserve Page. Page Will Be Available Shortly]=
 +
----
 +
=[http://ejexatul.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 +
----
 +
</div>
  
 
== Hacker sharing ==  
 
== Hacker sharing ==  

Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)