User:Mcint/NBRequestsForRonald

Note: noisebridge members (in good standing), feel free to add to this page, sign with ~ ~ ~ ~ (no spaces, username & timestamp).

As expressed by members around 03:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC), Noisebridge should not consider reversing the 86 of Ronald without progress on these requests. As the 86 page mentions, any desire to reach out on his part should happen through the mediation email, and not by attending meetings unless except as requested by the mediator.

Requests

• Accept responsibility for his (he might say, "his part in"):
  • Sleeping in the space after being asked to stop
  • Returning to the space, to sleep, continually access storage, continue accepting mail at NB
    • Despite being asked to stop.

• Show changed, and trustworthy, behavior.
  • Redirect mail to somewhere besides Noisebridge.

Comments and Opinions

If he wants to rebuild trust with the community and get to the point where people might consider his request, he should show us concrete behavioral changes. Redirecting his mail elsewhere would be a great place to start. It's not hard to do either. ~ User:Dana

As someone who was not a party to rons behavior other than through the meeting, I can say what I saw was remorselessness and a complete lack of growth mindset. His entitled viewpoint lacked any awareness of wrong doing. At the very least, a person seeking forgiveness should own a majority burden of demonstrating growth of character. He instead showed utter resistance to it.
I applaud Mark for allowing Ron to state his case.  I agree it was challenging but I think allowing impartial community members  to be a part of the mediation allowed a greater consensus as to what is the right move for the community.

Reference

https://noisebridge.slack.com/archives/C02B511QP/p1678262626188959