User talk:AlSweigart: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎The reasons: new section)
Line 2: Line 2:


A couple weeks ago, you deleted many pages from the wiki which I don't think should have been deleted. After talking to you briefly about it on IM, I undeleted most of them, because I see the wiki revision history as an important part of Noisebridge's history. Now I see you have deleted a couple more. I totally agree with you that Patrick's [[Reservations]] page was misguided, but I think the appropriate course of action is to replace it with a redirect and keep its history visible. This way, if someone else wants to create a similar page in the future, they can be informed by what has happened previously. Especially with a page like that which someone clearly still wanted to develop further, it seems to me like an abuse of your wiki admin privileges to delete it. I have undeleted it and replaced it with a redirect. I hope that in the future you will refrain from deleting pages which are not outright abusive/spam/etc or who's deletion was requested by the page's primary author. Thanks! - [[User:Leif|Leif]] 19:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
A couple weeks ago, you deleted many pages from the wiki which I don't think should have been deleted. After talking to you briefly about it on IM, I undeleted most of them, because I see the wiki revision history as an important part of Noisebridge's history. Now I see you have deleted a couple more. I totally agree with you that Patrick's [[Reservations]] page was misguided, but I think the appropriate course of action is to replace it with a redirect and keep its history visible. This way, if someone else wants to create a similar page in the future, they can be informed by what has happened previously. Especially with a page like that which someone clearly still wanted to develop further, it seems to me like an abuse of your wiki admin privileges to delete it. I have undeleted it and replaced it with a redirect. I hope that in the future you will refrain from deleting pages which are not outright abusive/spam/etc or who's deletion was requested by the page's primary author. Thanks! - [[User:Leif|Leif]] 19:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
== The reasons ==
I exist as long as we have the following problems:
* people sleeping in Noisebridge
* membership being totally retarded
* people blocking unnecessarily
* idiots not getting banned for serious infractions
Fix Noisebridge before fixing the wiki.
Also I am making a document for the landlord. Don't think that I won't make this go nuclear. [[User:ImageReplacer|ImageReplacer]] ([[User talk:ImageReplacer|talk]]) 16:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:06, 6 February 2014

Deleting pages from the wiki

A couple weeks ago, you deleted many pages from the wiki which I don't think should have been deleted. After talking to you briefly about it on IM, I undeleted most of them, because I see the wiki revision history as an important part of Noisebridge's history. Now I see you have deleted a couple more. I totally agree with you that Patrick's Reservations page was misguided, but I think the appropriate course of action is to replace it with a redirect and keep its history visible. This way, if someone else wants to create a similar page in the future, they can be informed by what has happened previously. Especially with a page like that which someone clearly still wanted to develop further, it seems to me like an abuse of your wiki admin privileges to delete it. I have undeleted it and replaced it with a redirect. I hope that in the future you will refrain from deleting pages which are not outright abusive/spam/etc or who's deletion was requested by the page's primary author. Thanks! - Leif 19:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

The reasons

I exist as long as we have the following problems:

  • people sleeping in Noisebridge
  • membership being totally retarded
  • people blocking unnecessarily
  • idiots not getting banned for serious infractions

Fix Noisebridge before fixing the wiki.

Also I am making a document for the landlord. Don't think that I won't make this go nuclear. ImageReplacer (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)