User talk:Gregorydillon: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Associate Membership is over by meeting consensus.  I don't see it as a big deal, but I liked it.
 
== Synthesizer Destroyed  ==
 
I heard a very sad story that someone destroyed the tower that went with the synthesizer. 
 
If its true, those people should get an opportunity to explain themselves, and if lacking '''be gone.'''
 
== Stay positive about the status of house rules ==
 
[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 22:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Well my summary of conversation with Kevin and others, is there is some resistance to calling them "house rule" since its not a house, and there is an anti-rules bias.    That's a legitimate point, so okay, change the name.
 
There does seem to be consensus that living at Noisebridge is not okay.  -  My counter is that doesn't go far  "By the time someone is living at Noisebridge, we've waited too long." And once someone is living there, its not easy to deal with, True today.  True yesterday.
 
I believe there is wide willingness to experiment on changing things about kitchen mess.  People who don't use the kitchen don't like the mess and mice, and people who do use the kitchen correctly don't like the mess and mice.
 
 
[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 22:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Well I''m concerned because the meeting notes look like house rules were consensus-ed, that Kevin came late, and negotiated with Tom to un-consensus the house rules.
 
Wednesday, about 6:40 pm I spoke to Kevin about some of my concerns. I want to summarize the conversation, and send it in an email before talking generally on it.[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 03:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 
== Mornings at Noisebridge ==
[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 18:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Noisebridge 2 sleepers + 2 regular sleepers awake + 2 street people i don't know + dog +mess this morning.
 
= "I've got better options than this"    I left right away somewhat annoyed that I spent the time to go there and found the condition so bad. 
 
Came to Noisebridge for the first time in a month in the morning and that's what I found at 10:15 this am
 
One guy openly sleeping on the front couch.  One guy appears asleep at the back.  The turning classroom is setup like a 1980's crash pad livingroom.    People eating breakfast in the library.  The main table and front area, a big mess the day after teh "monthly cleanup"
 
[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 18:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 
----
 
 
I haven't been going to Noisebridge in the morning since February 19 -immediately after I asked NO_Hat to leave, he asked me to leave.
 
Here is the Permalink to older content
https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=User_talk:Gregorydillon&oldid=40689
 
I am using the changed circumstances to do some rethinking about this important topic.
 
But please, anyone who reads and is also interested in having a positive morning experience at Noisebridge, I'd like you to comment.    Maybe as simple as taking turns sharing bringing breakfast pastries and cleaning the coffee area.[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 17:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 
Fair Usage Policy
 
In place of house rules, I've drafted  a Noisebridge [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/24/files?short_path=aeee244#diff-aeee244e45389715063ed41c59a04307 fair usage] and put it up on the github repository.
 
I'm just starting to get comfortable with Git and Github, so that's my explanation if I did something wrong.
 
Through the discuss list, I've also suggested that it would be excellent if Kevin could provide his version of house rule with enough time for people too consider prior to the Tuesday meeting.

Latest revision as of 11:28, 5 November 2014

Associate Membership is over by meeting consensus. I don't see it as a big deal, but I liked it.