Difference between revisions of "User talk:Gregorydillon"

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Associate Membership is over by meeting consensus.  I don't see it as a big deal, but I liked it.
== Mornings at Noisebridge ==
[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 18:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Noisebridge 2 sleepers + 2 regular sleepers awake + 2 street people i don't know + dog +mess this morning.
= "I've got better options than this"    I left right away somewhat annoyed that I spent the time to go there and found the condition so bad. 
Came to Noisebridge for the first time in a month in the morning and that's what I found at 10:15 this am
One guy openly sleeping on the front couchOne guy appears asleep at the back.  The turning classroom is setup like a 1980's crash pad livingroom.    People eating breakfast in the library.  The main table and front area, a big mess the day after teh "monthly cleanup"
[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 18:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
I haven't been going to Noisebridge in the morning since February 19 -immediately after I asked NO_Hat to leave, he asked me to leave.
Here is the Permalink to older content
I am using the changed circumstances to do some rethinking about this important topic.
But please, anyone who reads and is also interested in having a positive morning experience at Noisebridge, I'd like you to comment.    Maybe as simple as taking turns sharing bringing breakfast pastries and cleaning the coffee area.[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 17:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
== Meeting Events of 3-11-2014 ==
The meeting notes show two issues that I've been involved in. 
1) This was a short discussion. We firmly agreed that there is no reason why Gregory should not feel welcome to come to Noisebridge.
What's that about?
Back on  February 19, immediately after I asked Josh / NO_Hat to leave and not come back until the Tuesday meeting, he asked me to leave.  I completely felt it was in bad faith, and it even looks like Josh  tried to back track about it, but I followed the guidelines. 
problem is - I can't come to the Tuesday meetings, and it took some time to resolve this.   Thanks all.
2) Banning Josh condensed.
== Stay positive about the status of house rules ==
Well I''m concerned because the meeting notes look like house rules were consensus-ed, that Kevin came late, and negotiated with Tom to un-consensus the house rules.
Wednesday, about 6:40 pm I spoke to Kevin about some of my concerns. I want to summarize the conversation, and send it in an email before talking generally on it.[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 03:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:28, 5 November 2014

Associate Membership is over by meeting consensus. I don't see it as a big deal, but I liked it.