User talk:Gregorydillon: Difference between revisions
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Well I''m concerned because the meeting notes look like house rules were consensus-ed, that Kevin came late, and negotiated with Tom to un-consensus the house rules. | Well I''m concerned because the meeting notes look like house rules were consensus-ed, that Kevin came late, and negotiated with Tom to un-consensus the house rules. | ||
Wednesday, about 6:40 pm I spoke to Kevin about some of my concerns. I want to summarize the conversation, and send it in an email before talking generally on it. | Wednesday, about 6:40 pm I spoke to Kevin about some of my concerns. I want to summarize the conversation, and send it in an email before talking generally on it.[[User:Gregorydillon|Greg]] ([[User talk:Gregorydillon|talk]]) 03:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:34, 19 March 2014
Mornings at Noisebridge
Greg (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Noisebridge 2 sleepers + 2 regular sleepers awake + 2 street people i don't know + dog +mess this morning.
= "I've got better options than this" I left right away somewhat annoyed that I spent the time to go there and found the condition so bad.
Came to Noisebridge for the first time in a month in the morning and that's what I found at 10:15 this am
One guy openly sleeping on the front couch. One guy appears asleep at the back. The turning classroom is setup like a 1980's crash pad livingroom. People eating breakfast in the library. The main table and front area, a big mess the day after teh "monthly cleanup"
Greg (talk) 18:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
I haven't been going to Noisebridge in the morning since February 19 -immediately after I asked NO_Hat to leave, he asked me to leave.
Here is the Permalink to older content https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=User_talk:Gregorydillon&oldid=40689
I am using the changed circumstances to do some rethinking about this important topic.
But please, anyone who reads and is also interested in having a positive morning experience at Noisebridge, I'd like you to comment. Maybe as simple as taking turns sharing bringing breakfast pastries and cleaning the coffee area.Greg (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Meeting Events of 3-11-2014
The meeting notes show two issues that I've been involved in.
1) This was a short discussion. We firmly agreed that there is no reason why Gregory should not feel welcome to come to Noisebridge.
Yeah!! What's that about? Back on February 19, immediately after I asked Josh / NO_Hat to leave and not come back until the Tuesday meeting, he asked me to leave. I completely felt it was in bad faith, and it even looks like Josh tried to back track about it, but I followed the guidelines. https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=AskedToLeave&diff=next&oldid=40668#Guidelines problem is - I can't come to the Tuesday meetings, and it took some time to resolve this. Thanks all.
2) Banning Josh condensed.
https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Meeting_Notes_2014_03_11&oldid=40675#Banning_Josh
Stay positive about the status of house rules
Well Im concerned because the meeting notes look like house rules were consensus-ed, that Kevin came late, and negotiated with Tom to un-consensus the house rules.
Wednesday, about 6:40 pm I spoke to Kevin about some of my concerns. I want to summarize the conversation, and send it in an email before talking generally on it.Greg (talk) 03:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)