[ml] machine learning 10/17 @ 7:30pm: stanford ML course

Jared Dunne jareddunne at gmail.com
Mon Oct 17 17:23:46 PDT 2011


It's looking like I can't make it tonight, so let me clarify my
proposal in case someone wants to put it forward tonight.

I'm not proposing moving the normal ML meetup from Mondays.  Rather,
I'd propose that people interested in a ml-class.org study group
organize a different day for the study group so it aligns better with
the class schedule.  This would keep the Monday meetup slot free for
whatever folks want to use it for (talks, workshops, etc), while
allowing the ML study group to meet later in the week to help each
other with lecture reviews and assignments.

I'll leave it to you all that show up tonight to decide.  I think
Wednesday or Thursday evenings would be good days for a ml-class study
group to meet.  If you all want to keep it on Monday in the normal
slot, that's cool with me too.

Jared-

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Mike Schachter <mike at mindmech.com> wrote:
> We had a vote on this a while back and Monday worked out
> for everyone who voted. I'm not going to argue back and forth
> about what day is best - there is always going to be someone
> who is left out.
>
> However, it would be good for the meetups to be more adaptive,
> so that people who want to attend specific meetups all decide
> on which day works best for all of them. Let's do that for next
> week.
>
>  mike
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Thomas Eliot <bgaesop at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I agree, both that we should meet up and that a day other than monday would
>> probably be best. Is anyone else taking the AI class and want to do that
>> together as well? Also, I shan't be able to attend this week, as I am in New
>> York until Wednesday
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2011 10:01 PM, "Jared Dunne" <jareddunne at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm 50/50 on whether I'll be able to make it tomorrow.
>>> Generally, I support the idea of having a Noisebridge study group for
>>> the ml class.
>>>
>>> A shift in day might make sense though, seeing how Week 1 deadlines
>>> are today yet we are going to review Week 2 lectures tomorrow.  I'll
>>> bring it up tomorrow for discussion with attendees, but chime in
>>> on-list if you can't make it but have input.
>>>
>>> j-
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Glenn Wright
>>> <infinite.perplexity at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I'll be there, too.
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Mike Schachter <mike at mindmech.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hey everyone,
>>> >>
>>> >> In the absence of someone with a different agenda,
>>> >> I think it'd be great to meet up like people did last
>>> >> week and move forward with the Stanford ML course.
>>> >>
>>> >> Seems like this week they're talking about linear
>>> >> regression with multiple variables, last week was
>>> >> a linear algebra review. I'll be in tomorrow to help
>>> >> out anyone who is working through the course.
>>> >>
>>> >> The ML group meets up Mondays at 7:30pm in the
>>> >> Church room. See you there!
>>> >>
>>> >>  mike
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> ml mailing list
>>> >> ml at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/ml
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > -Glenn
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > ml mailing list
>>> > ml at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/ml
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ml mailing list
>>> ml at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/ml
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ml mailing list
>> ml at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/ml
>>
>>
>


More information about the ml mailing list