[Neuro] tDCS at Noisebridge?

Anthony Di Franco di.franco at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 01:49:58 UTC 2013


I meant the question in the general sense you point out.
On Apr 17, 2013 6:25 PM, "Mike Schachter" <mschachter at eigenminds.com> wrote:

> Out of curiosity - what effect are you trying to achieve? Wouldn't that
> dictate where you "aim" it?
>
>  mike
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Anthony Di Franco <di.franco at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> More to the point then, what's the best prior info right now on how to
>> aim these things?
>> On Apr 17, 2013 3:34 PM, "Kelly" <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am way more skeptical of tdcs than the average tdcs hobbyist because I
>>> basically do data analysis and modeling and almost no practical
>>> applications, so I am trained to be overly critical and believe nothing.
>>>
>>> That said, you should probably make some notes about task structure and
>>> timing, stimulation time, current direction, and the location and size of
>>> both anode and cathode.
>>>
>>> John is pretty good at being skeptical of the literature though, so I
>>> expect he will have things to add or leave out per task. Those are the
>>> basics I would want to see from a rough science perspective though.
>>> On Apr 17, 2013 6:11 PM, "Anthony Di Franco" <di.franco at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can appreciate both the idea that phrenology doesn't work and the
>>>> idea that there is some amount of statistical consistency across
>>>> populations in roughly what brain regions do what and how people respond to
>>>> stimulation of various kinds in various regions.
>>>> Where would you say the distinction relevant to playing with tdcs is,
>>>> if you can? (So this can be part of the documentation being assembled, I
>>>> hope.)
>>>> On Apr 17, 2013 3:04 PM, "Kelly" <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd just like to remind everyone that phrenology doesn't work,
>>>>> regardless of what you put in your table. But a list of some basic regions
>>>>> with citations would be an awesome start. It's probably worth making
>>>>> roughly tabular even if some line items are wildly less dependable than
>>>>> others because there are probably a few parameters that you care about for
>>>>> each region.
>>>>>
>>>>> K
>>>>> On Apr 17, 2013 4:33 PM, "John Withers" <jwithers at reddagger.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/17/2013 01:10 PM, Anthony Di Franco wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A section on some hackerspace's wiki summarizing where to put what
>>>>>>> kind of stimulation to accomplish what would be ideal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, I am actually working on that. It's part of a larger project
>>>>>> and going to take me another few days to complete. But when I am done I
>>>>>> will make sure there are links to it on the noisebridge wiki as well that
>>>>>> of a couple of other spaces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> j
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> Neuro mailing list
>>>>>> Neuro at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/**mailman/listinfo/neuro<https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/neuro>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Neuro mailing list
>>>>> Neuro at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/neuro
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neuro mailing list
>> Neuro at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/neuro
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neuro mailing list
> Neuro at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/neuro
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/neuro/attachments/20130417/fbb76e6f/attachment.html>


More information about the Neuro mailing list