[Noisebridge-discuss] We are a winnar.

Albert Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 16:17:06 PST 2011


It was part of the consensus item we passed a week ago that the voting
would take place after the Tuesday meeting. Technically the polls were
open *up to* Tuesday evening, but nobody had ballots ready.

https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Consensus_Items_History

-Al

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Shannon Lee <shannon at scatter.com> wrote:
> So, it was my understanding that we were deciding last night; however,
> Lamont isn't the first person to mention that he thought there would be a
> week of voting time.
> --S
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Lamont Lucas <lamont at cluepon.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/19/11 1:14 PM, miloh wrote:
>> >> ... 16 members who voted last
>> >> night (although they were two people's 6th and 7th choices).
>> >>
>> >
>> > That's ~37% in person member turnout.  Are the rest all "don't care's"
>> > or "don't knows"?
>>
>> I'd meant to vote, but got stuck in a colo till 11pm last night.  I had
>> it in my head that we'd have a week to complete the ballot, not that
>> things would be fully decided last night, but that was my
>> misunderstanding.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Shannon Lee
> (503) 539-3700
>
> "Any sufficiently analyzed magic is indistinguishable from science."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list