[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus item for next week - Member- & Guest- Only Hours

Al Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 13:30:43 PDT 2011


Wording fail, the former is outnumbered by the latter, not the former
outnumbers the latter.

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
> How big of an impact would this new rule have? How many non-members
> make use of the space after midnight when there aren't members around?
> (And how many non-members are just hanging out during that time?) My
> impression from being at the space late at night/in the morning in the
> past few weeks was that the former not only outnumber the later but
> heavily outnumber them. There is a cost to having this rule, but I
> think it is outweighed by the benefit. But if my impression is
> actually wrong, then I'd withdraw this consensus item myself.
>
> How about we also hold off enforcing this rule for the first couple of
> months after it is approved, to give time for nonmembers to become
> members?
>
> Or how about instead of just members and their guests, we also allow
> people who are completely new to the space to be there late at night
> for their first month? This kind of makes the rule more complicated,
> but how can we simplify it?
>
> -Al
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net> wrote:
>> I block any new rules that take away access to non-members of which they
>> already have. Sorry.
>>
>> --
>> Rubin Abdi
>> rubin at starset.net
>>
>>
>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list