[Noisebridge-discuss] Seeking lathe assistance

Distance Everheart adraghastar at gmail.com
Tue Nov 15 22:48:29 PST 2011


You can reach me at 415-328-1179 if you have time to discuss assisting me
with a lathe project. Thanks,
A'dra
On Nov 15, 2011 12:00 PM, <noisebridge-discuss-request at lists.noisebridge.net>
wrote:

> Send Noisebridge-discuss mailing list submissions to
>        noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        noisebridge-discuss-request at lists.noisebridge.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        noisebridge-discuss-owner at lists.noisebridge.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Noisebridge-discuss digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: electrically conductive heatsink compound? (Sean Cusack)
>   2. Re: electrically conductive heatsink compound? (Taylor Alexander)
>   3. Re: electrically conductive heatsink      compound? (Andy Isaacson)
>   4. Re: electrically conductive heatsink compound? (Taylor Alexander)
>   5. Re: Facilitation training workshop at     #occupysf Sunday
>      (Danny O'Brien)
>   6. Re: Diaspora hack session (Chris Murphy)
>   7. Consensus yummyness (rachel lyra hospodar)
>   8. internet censorship: congress is giving you       it for xmas (lilia)
>   9. Re: internet censorship: congress is giving you it for xmas
>      (Matt Thrailkill)
>  10. Re: internet censorship: congress is giving       you it for xmas
>      (Joshua Juran)
>  11. Re: internet censorship: congress is giving       you it for xmas
>      (Gopiballava Flaherty)
>  12. Re: internet censorship: congress is giving you it for xmas
>      (Matt Thrailkill)
>  13. Seeking skilled wood lathe user (Distance Everheart)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sean Cusack <sean.p.cusack at gmail.com>
> To: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:38:38 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] electrically conductive heatsink
> compound?
> I don't have any, but the only place I know where to get some would be
> McMaster...otherwise known as Jesus's closet (if its on earth...its
> probably there too):
>
> http://www.mcmaster.com/#thermal-epoxies/=exnupx
>
> It appears to be worth its weight in crack. Lame. :(
>
> Sean
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>
>> does anyone have, or know where i can find, electrically conductive
>> heatsink compound?
>>
>> I am dealing with this transistor where get this, the source of the
>> transistor is the heatsink surface.  I guess in factory situations they
>> somehow solder it to the heatsink?  I dunno.  it's ridiculous.
>>
>> anyway gimme some.  I want it.  I just need a little bit, i'll order more
>> on the internet to make more.
>>
>> oh and i know you're curious what the transistor is, it's MRF6V2300N
>>
>>
>> http://www.highfrequencyelectronics.com/Archives/Apr08/HFE0408_Eguizabal.pdf
>>
>> -jake
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Taylor Alexander <tlalexander at gmail.com>
> To: sean.p.cusack at gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:44:31 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] electrically conductive heatsink
> compound?
> Yeah, normally you use hot air to solder stuff like that. It works great.
>
> Does Noisebridge have a hot air reflow machine?
>
> -Taylor
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Sean Cusack <sean.p.cusack at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I don't have any, but the only place I know where to get some would be
>> McMaster...otherwise known as Jesus's closet (if its on earth...its
>> probably there too):
>>
>> http://www.mcmaster.com/#thermal-epoxies/=exnupx
>>
>> It appears to be worth its weight in crack. Lame. :(
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>>
>>> does anyone have, or know where i can find, electrically conductive
>>> heatsink compound?
>>>
>>> I am dealing with this transistor where get this, the source of the
>>> transistor is the heatsink surface.  I guess in factory situations they
>>> somehow solder it to the heatsink?  I dunno.  it's ridiculous.
>>>
>>> anyway gimme some.  I want it.  I just need a little bit, i'll order more
>>> on the internet to make more.
>>>
>>> oh and i know you're curious what the transistor is, it's MRF6V2300N
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.highfrequencyelectronics.com/Archives/Apr08/HFE0408_Eguizabal.pdf
>>>
>>> -jake
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org>
> To: Taylor Alexander <tlalexander at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:54:52 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] electrically conductive heatsink
> compound?
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:44:31PM -0800, Taylor Alexander wrote:
> > Yeah, normally you use hot air to solder stuff like that. It works great.
> >
> > Does Noisebridge have a hot air reflow machine?
>
> Yes, it works quite well.  I've used it for some SMT rework.
>
> -andy
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Taylor Alexander <tlalexander at gmail.com>
> To: Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:57:20 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] electrically conductive heatsink
> compound?
> There's some handy (if a bit out of date) info on SMT soldering here:
>
> http://www.sparkfun.com/tutorials/category/2
>
> -Taylor
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:44:31PM -0800, Taylor Alexander wrote:
>> > Yeah, normally you use hot air to solder stuff like that. It works
>> great.
>> >
>> > Does Noisebridge have a hot air reflow machine?
>>
>> Yes, it works quite well.  I've used it for some SMT rework.
>>
>> -andy
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Danny O'Brien" <danny at spesh.com>
> To: miloh <froggytoad at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:49:25 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Facilitation training workshop at
> #occupysf Sunday
> I wish I'd made it to this -- I tried really hard.
>
> Would anyone be interested in coming to Meeting tomorrow and talking
> about what we might learn from it? I'm already hearing  of a bunch of
> consensus-related ideas by osmosis from Occupy.
>
> I'm pretty also curious about having NB have some actual working
> groups to work on problems, and interested in best practice of tying
> that with consensus...
>
> d.
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 5:36 PM, miloh <froggytoad at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Whoah! I am mosdef going to this, havent seen rahula for 12 years
> >
> > On Nov 12, 2011 1:12 PM, "mark burdett" <mfburdett at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:48 PM, rachel lyra hospodar
> >> <rachelyra at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > 5:30. I hope you all can attend, Rahula Janowski will be facilitating
> >>
> >> rahula is great - I'd definitely recommend attending if you're
> >> interested in learning about facilitation
> >> --mark
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Chris Murphy <chrisnoisebridge at gmail.com>
> To: Mitch Altman <maltman23 at hotmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:09:13 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Diaspora hack session
> I set up this memorial wiki page. I photographed this gif of him last
> spring.
>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Ilya_Zhitomirskiy
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 13, 2011, at 22:38, Mitch Altman <maltman23 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Way too sad.  I'll really miss him.
>
>
>
>
> > From: jeff.tchang at gmail.com
> > Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:54:59 -0800
> > To: noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Diaspora hack session
> >
> > For those who haven't heard, Ilya passed away recently. He frequented
> > Noisebridge and was a hacker in many respects.
> >
> >
> http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/13/diaspora-co-founder-ilya-zhitomirskiy-passes-away-at-21/
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Ilya Zhitomirskiy <ilya at joindiaspora.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hey Everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm Ilya. My current project is Diaspora (http://www.joindiaspora.com/
> ).
> > > You might have seen me around; I'm usually there on the weekends. I am
> > > always super inspired/excited/re-energized by the Noisebridge (as by
> all
> > > hackerspaces, being from NYC I used to hangout at Resistor and Alpha
> One
> > > Labs from time to time). I've been talking to Jonathan and Lief about
> > > possibly having a weekly/bi-weekly Diaspora hack session.
> > >
> > > I was just wondering if that will be alright? We were thinking about
> > > Sat. Nov. 13 at 1 pm.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ilya
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: rachel lyra hospodar <rachelyra at gmail.com>
> To: noisebridge-discuss <Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>,
> "Danny O'Brien" <danny at spesh.com>, miloh <froggytoad at gmail.com>, Rubin
> Abdi <rubin at starset.net>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:41:22 -0800
> Subject: [Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus yummyness
> hey all,
>
> i did some pretty brute-force information-cramming on the wiki
>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Consensus_Process
> https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/More_Consensus_Info
>
> Haven't done much formatting and whoever wrote the bike-shed
> explanation (it seems pretty rubin-esque to me) probably will feel sad
> that i crammed all this info above it, feel free to integrate what i
> pooed on top into the page better.
>
> This info came from a document compiled by Steve Leeds, a Quaker.
> below is the email that accompanied it.
>
> I'd love to have more conversation around this.  not sure when though.
>  Tuesday meetings are hard for me to make right now (peanut gallery
> performance last week notwithstanding)
>
> <3
> R.
>
> Hi Tom:
>
> I believe you called the SF Friends (Quaker) Meeting a few days back
> about the consensus process and requesting someone come to the GA.
> Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I couldn't hear the cell
> number you left on the phone machine.
> I've attended quite a few GA's and pretty much decided it wasn't my
> best use of time anymore. I'm working on Occupy in other areas
> and am in camp generally every day until this past week when work and
> responsibilities intervened.
>
> A few thoughts: Quakers have been using the consensus process for 350+
> years. It's a process that requires
> patience and ongoing commitment to work through differences and only
> block if you have huge moral objections to an idea/proposal
> that will drive you from the group. Pure consensus works best in small
> groups (action/affinity groups where the individuals have
> had a chance to get to know each other and build community). For a
> group like the GA in OccupySF, I suggest modified consensus, 80% or
> 90% coming to unity.
> Or even two-thirds. Unity is not unanimity. My observation of GA's I
> attended are way too often many people block consensus and the process
> is frustrating for many people, particularly new people who are
> present for the first time. I believe there is a deep misunderstanding
> of the consensus in both language (as an example consensus isn't like
> an individual voting so when the facilitator says let's vote, I
> believe the language perpetuates  and elevates the ability of one
> person to keep the group from moving forward) and  process (it
> requires deep listening, takes time, and shows us the whole group is
> more important than the individual)l. Learning this and collective
> responsibility is a sea-change for all of us as the mainstream culture
> has inculcated and brainwashed us with the paramount importance of our
> individuality. I see this everywhere in the culture, including in
> Occupy SF and the GA.
>
> Honestly, I don't know how the GA decision-making process is working
> most recently. I have  included some links and a PDF below of some
> resources..
> Feel free to contact me. I've been away and will be at camp tomorrow
> late afternoon. Hope the resources below are helpful.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve Leeds
>
>
> Some resources:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus_decision-making#Quaker_model
>
> http://legacy.earlham.edu/~consense/howwks.shtml
>
>
> Consensus Process
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: lilia <liliakai at gmail.com>
> To: noisebridge-discuss <Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:31:04 -0800
> Subject: [Noisebridge-discuss] internet censorship: congress is giving you
> it for xmas
> http://boingboing.net/2011/11/11/stop-sopa-save-the-internet.html
>
> "The worst bill in Internet history is about to become law...this law
> would give government and corporations the power to block sites like
> BoingBoing over infringing links on at least one webpage posted by
> their users. Believe the EFF, Public Knowledge, Google when they say
> this bill is about much more than copyright, it's about the Internet
> and free speech everywhere."
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Matt Thrailkill <matt at thrailkill.org>
> To: lilia <liliakai at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:41:26 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] internet censorship: congress is giving
> you it for xmas
> The first thing that springs to mind when I read about this and
> PROTECT-IP; can I just spam out bogus complaints about sites I don't
> like so they can be forced offline until someone has a chance to
> hand-process it?  Will I be able to take CNN offline because someone
> in a comment thread quotes me without my permission?  Or does a person
> have to be a huge corporation to do all the fun stuff?
>
> These laws are just begging to be abused..
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:31 PM, lilia <liliakai at gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://boingboing.net/2011/11/11/stop-sopa-save-the-internet.html
> >
> > "The worst bill in Internet history is about to become law...this law
> > would give government and corporations the power to block sites like
> > BoingBoing over infringing links on at least one webpage posted by
> > their users. Believe the EFF, Public Knowledge, Google when they say
> > this bill is about much more than copyright, it's about the Internet
> > and free speech everywhere."
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Joshua Juran <jjuran at gmail.com>
> To: Matt Thrailkill <matt at thrailkill.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:31:10 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] internet censorship: congress is giving
> you it for xmas
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:41 PM, Matt Thrailkill wrote:
>
>  The first thing that springs to mind when I read about this and
>> PROTECT-IP; can I just spam out bogus complaints about sites I don't
>> like so they can be forced offline until someone has a chance to
>> hand-process it?  Will I be able to take CNN offline because someone
>> in a comment thread quotes me without my permission?  Or does a person
>> have to be a huge corporation to do all the fun stuff?
>>
>
> Isn't it awesome how the question just answers itself?
>
>  These laws are just begging to be abused..
>>
>
> No, X is just begging for Y when Y is an undesirable but likely outcome of
> X that was *not* intended by X's creators.  Sending session tokens
> unencrypted, for example, was just begging for an exploit like FireSheep --
> the guilty parties just assumed that this would never happen, or figured
> they'd wait to deal with it when it did, or they were just oblivious.  They
> certainly didn't mean to enable session hijacking.  On the other hand, I
> assert that SOPA was created for the sole purpose of being abused.  Hello
> Kafka, hello Orwell.
>
> Josh
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Gopiballava Flaherty <gopiballava at gmail.com>
> To: noisebridge-discuss <Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:08:51 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] internet censorship: congress is giving
> you it for xmas
>
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 23:31, Joshua Juran <jjuran at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, I assert that SOPA was
> > created for the sole purpose of being abused.
>
> I suspect that the lack of oversight was put in there by copyright owners
> so that pesky web sites couldn't avoid trouble by doing sneaky things such
> as not actually violating laws.
>
> From what I've heard and seen of them, they are intentionally oblivious to
> the effects of their actions. Online discussion forums are collateral
> damage in the important war against pirates.
>
> To paraphrase an exchange I heard at the Commerce Department:
> Jack Valenti: "We didn't want to stop VCRs, we just wanted a modest
> royalty"
> Phillips rep: "I seem to remember hearing the word 'injunction' and an
> amount of $80 per tape mentioned..."
>
> Their lobbyists act like (and are) attorneys arguing their case in the
> strongest terms. This might work in court where the other side listens and
> rebuts. But in lobbying it doesn't work like that. Our side doesn't get
> formal rebuttal.
>
> Thanks,
>
> gopi at iPhone
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Matt Thrailkill <matt at thrailkill.org>
> To: Gopiballava Flaherty <gopiballava at gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:19:31 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] internet censorship: congress is giving
> you it for xmas
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Gopiballava Flaherty
> <gopiballava at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Their lobbyists act like (and are) attorneys arguing their case in the
> strongest terms. This might work in court where the other side listens and
> rebuts. But in lobbying it doesn't work like that. Our side doesn't get
> formal rebuttal.
>
> ... or does it work that way?  Seems like it may turn out well for
> them in this case.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Distance Everheart <adraghastar at gmail.com>
> To: noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:48:20 -0800
> Subject: [Noisebridge-discuss] Seeking skilled wood lathe user
>
> I have an artistic utilitarian endeavor that requires use of the lathe. Is
> there someone who could help me craft some wood screws?
>
> Thanks,
> A'draghastar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20111115/7c8cd73d/attachment.htm 


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list