[Noisebridge-discuss] [dorkbotsf-blabber] Embedded code - version control experience?

Tymm Twillman tymmothy at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 13:08:36 PST 2012


I really like Git for both embedded & non-embedded.  Especially as I
do a fair amount of editing on the go, and the ability to commit to a
local repo & then later sync to my master repo is great.  I've made
the move from SVN recently, and haven't looked back.

Doing source control with integrated IDE systems I've found to be a
little annoying (figuring out which IDE files you want excluded from
the repo, and how to make your settings files repo-friendly... i.e.
getting things to use relative paths instead of putting paths that
have your home directory name in them)...

Git also supports submodules (SVN might also by now; I know there's
been a lot of work on subversion recently)... which means you can have
projects that import other projects as dependencies, rather than
replicating code in multiple repositories.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Anders Nelson
<anders.k.nelson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello fine people,
>
> Does anyone use version control for their embedded project code? I want to
> start using MPLAB X, which has version control built into the IDE but I'm
> curious to know if using a more accepted standard (SVN, etc) is a better
> idea. Then, of course, what's the best way to organize a repository?
>
> Me thinks appending a new dated name to each file I modify is not the way to
> go anymore...
>
> =]
> --
> Anders Nelson
>
> www.erogear.com
>
>
> ----------
>
> dorkbot: people doing strange things with electricity
> http://dorkbot.org/dorkbotsf/
> SUBSCRIPTION AND UNSUBSCRIBE OPTIONS HERE:
> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/dorkbotsf-blabber
>
> ----------


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list