[Noisebridge-discuss] [dorkbotsf-blabber] Embedded code - version control experience?

Christopher Maujean cmaujean at gmail.com
Fri Feb 17 21:23:26 PST 2012


I use version control for everything. Random thoughts even. If it is text
that changes, it should be in VC.

--Christopher
On Feb 17, 2012 8:47 PM, "Ben Kochie" <superq at gmail.com> wrote:

> Also people who use svn are ugly and stupid. (Linus Torvalds)
> On Feb 17, 2012 5:55 PM, "ryan rawson" <ryanobjc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Cvs and svn also suck at binary files. Perforce is ok at it (commercial).
>> Git is better than svn so it's a net win imho
>>
>> Sent from your iPhone
>>
>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Will Sargent <will.sargent at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > If you're using an open source project, there's very little reason not
>> > to use Github.
>> >
>> > The one thing Git is very bad at is managing large binary files, but
>> > other than that it does exactly what it says on the tin.
>> >
>> > Will.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:53 PM, ryan rawson <ryanobjc at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Often most IDE "source control" is ui on top of an existing system.
>> There is
>> >> no reason, and lots of reasons not to go with a custom source control.
>> For
>> >> example eclipse and IntelliJ have integration with git, svn and many
>> >> others.
>> >>
>> >> Sent from your iPhone
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 17, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I would suggest not using some applications revision control and use
>> >> something more standard like git.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:59 PM, anselm <anselm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I throw my stuff on github
>> >>>
>> >>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>
>> >>> On Feb 17, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Anders Nelson <
>> anders.k.nelson at gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello fine people,
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anyone use version control for their embedded project code? I
>> want to
>> >>> start using MPLAB X, which has version control built into the IDE but
>> I'm
>> >>> curious to know if using a more accepted standard (SVN, etc) is a
>> better
>> >>> idea. Then, of course, what's the best way to organize a repository?
>> >>>
>> >>> Me thinks appending a new dated name to each file I modify is not the
>> way
>> >>> to go anymore...
>> >>>
>> >>> =]
>> >>> --
>> >>> Anders Nelson
>> >>>
>> >>> www.erogear.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------
>> >>>
>> >>> dorkbot: people doing strange things with electricity
>> >>> http://dorkbot.org/dorkbotsf/
>> >>> SUBSCRIPTION AND UNSUBSCRIBE OPTIONS HERE:
>> >>> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/dorkbotsf-blabber
>> >>>
>> >>> ----------
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> >>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Ronald Cotoni
>> >> Systems Engineer
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20120217/e5abbde5/attachment.htm 


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list