jim at well.com
Fri May 4 15:11:46 PDT 2012
The circumstance at 83c was similar to 2169: a door
that is locked and people inside who pretty much let
in anyone who knocked.
As I understand things, The discussions people had
in the planning phase included an acknowledgement of a
publicly open place and its foreseeable problems.
Note that AMTD is pretty much a private club, and
deliberately so to test a model different from
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 13:25 -0700, Martin Bogomolni wrote:
> Originally, that was _not_ the case. There was a door, and to get in
> you needed a key for that door. The key was given to you _after_ you
> had petitioned for membership in The Book, and consensus was achieved
> for your induction.
> You could, of course, let someone in if you had a key... and if you
> knocked on the door, if someone let you into the shop, you were
> responsible for having let them in. There was no "open door"
> policy.. the lock was locked.
> We have a very permeable "door" at the moment, and there are
> non-keyholders inside the space who will let other non-keyholders in.
> Yes, this was -possible- at the old 83c space, but it generally
> wasn't an issue since it was a very small space and a fairly tight
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:06 PM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
> > My understanding is that the original concept
> > of Noisebridge was to be open to the public.
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss