[Noisebridge-discuss] Proposal Regarding Rob 2.0 and Cynthia Lee

jim jim at systemateka.com
Wed May 23 18:56:08 PDT 2012



    I don't believe you that the vast majority prefer 
anything in particular with respect to banning anyone. 
1. majority of whom? Noisebridge members or Noisebridge 
users or people who frequent Mission Street between 18th 
and 17th or whom else? 
2. I, a member of Noisebridge and user, like Cynthia and 
like that she's around. I have no idea who Rob 2.0 is. 
3. I hate that this banning topic continues to be bruited 
in the mailing list. STFU and do your thing in the space  <--- 
and let others do their things; if you don't like others  <--- 
or their things, ask if they and their activities are  <--- 
constraining you and yours: if so, talk to them and  <--- 
negotiate a deal; if not, STFU and do your thing.  <---




On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 15:31 -0700, Stan wrote:
> I have been ruminating on this matter for several minutes and believe I
> have come to a conclusion that will satisfy all parties involved.
> 
> The problem, as I see it (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong), is
> that the vast majority of Noisespace do not want notorious hippie
> Cynthia Lee or world-renowned autist Rob 2.0 at the space, while these
> two parties still enjoy participating.
> 
> Further to the initial problem, both Rob 2.0 and Cynthia Lee seem to be
> immune to both Ban Nicely and Ban Harder. In the interim, I would
> propose adding a We Really Mean It clause to the Ban Harder Memorandum
> of 1921, though further to that I have developed what I have codenamed
> The Ultimate Solution.
> 
> The Ultimate Solution requires only two things: 1) a step, which I have
> cleverly designated the Naughty Step; and 2) a willingness from all
> named parties to participate in The Ultimate Solution.
> 
> The Ultimate Solution works by only allowing a party who has previously
> been Banned Nicely and Banned Harder (in this case either Rob 2.0 or
> Cynthia Lee) to participate in Noisebridge activities whilst upon the
> Naughty Step. This way the Naughty Party (the party proscribed from
> anywhere but the Naughty Step) is out of the way of most rule-abiding
> Noisebridge attendees, yet still remains able to participate.
> 
> Advanced configurations of The Ultimate Solution are available and
> dependent only upon how many steps you have. Thus if you have two
> available steps, both Rob 2.0 and Cynthia could participate at the same
> time. While I have seen some configurations in which all available steps
> were designated Naughty Steps, I do not recommend this. I have found
> rare cases in which non-Naughty Parties enjoy chilling out max and
> relaxing all cool upon steps.
> 
> A completely unorthodox configuration of The Ultimate Solution involves
> designating a Naughty Chair instead of a Naughty Step. But this is only
> if you want to get buck wild.
> 
> All configurations of The Ultimate Solution may be used with optional
> dunce cap.
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list