[Noisebridge-discuss] Who do we want to exclude? [Drama]
alykaplan at gmail.com
Fri Apr 12 16:37:42 UTC 2013
I'd like to see the law that says this is illegal -- it certainly isn't
according to SF Fire Code.
However, it is always good to be excellent to your neighbors.
It may also be prohibited on your lease.
These are VERY different things.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Josh Juran <jjuran at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Andrew Byrne wrote:
> Nope, it's most definitely a violence towards others to not speak up when
>> Twitchy McJunkie decides to take a post-burrito nap during the physics
>> class visit. It's also violence towards others who leave b/c we tolerate
>> the presence of ignorant uggles with no interest in hacking or
>> self-improvement--those who don't care when their joissance overflows into
>> other's work space.
>> Don't minimize the pain... I came in this morning and promptly left
>> instead of addressing the sleeping corpses and smoking on the balcony, and
>> I'm rather stoic about such things.
> A reminder: Noisebridge doesn't have a balcony. It has a FIRE ESCAPE.
> * It's illegal to be on the fire escape at all (except when escaping a
> * We've been specifically asked by the grocers below not to smoke where
> the ashes fall on their wares and customers.
> Note that cigarette smoke on the fire escape invariably enters the space.
> Additionaly, let me point out the electronic cigarettes are no problem at
> all, and as far as I'm concerned, you're welcome to use them indoors.
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.**noisebridge.net<Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss