[Noisebridge-discuss] [drama] Addressing individuals

Tony Longshanks LeTigre anthonyletigre at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 20:37:09 UTC 2013

You are 1000% wrong, as with every single accusation I've ever read you
make about me. And there have been many.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Mitchel McAllister
<xonimmortal at yahoo.com>wrote:

> The only thing you "said" was snickering about it. You said nothing to
> either one of us. And you have consistently encouraged Dan's belligerent
> and disruptive behavior, because you knew that others were bothered by it.
>  -----Original Message-----
> Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 7:07:30 pm
> To: "Jeffrey Carl Faden" <jeffreyatw at gmail.com>
> Cc: Noisebridge Discuss <noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> From: "Tony Longshanks LeTigre" <anthonyletigre at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] [drama] Addressing individuals
> I understand your suggestion. In the case of "The Reverend Mik" and Dan
> Chinaski, I intended to tell them both in person this morning that I
> thought their violent behavior last night inhibited the workspace & made me
> uncomfortable in the space, & that since I said that last night & they
> disregarded or pretended not to hear it, I was going to take the next step
> & post it to the Disgust list. This is the same thing that happened with
> another individual (it's not a secret, but I'll refrain) a year or so ago
> after I confronted him about some mega shitty behavior on his part in the
> NB kitchen: not only did he not take responsibility or show any contrition,
> he escalated things further, at which point my options were to engage in a
> physical confrontation with him in the middle of the space, or bring it to
> the community's attention. I chose the latter.
> In the case of Daravinne, I intentionally broadcast personal info about her
> as an attack because I know she's a very private person & would hate that.
> I, on the other hand, hate having 3 years of work stolen from me, first by
> police, then by her. We're talking about things I've worked on on a DAILY
> basis for the last 3 years, which I have been unable to touch for the last
> 2 months. I knew I ran the risk of arrest, jail &c when I holed up in the
> darkroom in the unused lab at UCSF Parnassus, but I didn't expect it from a
> "friend," even one who had shown previous hints of her "true colors" in the
> past. In other words, airing that sort of personal attack is not something
> I would normally do, but you know the saying: all's fair. She promised to
> let me get my files off that computer before she took it back. She broke
> her promise, then failed to return the data to me after a reasonable period
> of time. That's all there is to it as far as I'm concerned. But I will keep
> my promise to J. & say no more about this, for now.
> JCF, your suggestion is well-intended, but assuming your post was at least
> partly inspired by my posts this morning, you are basicall
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130418/027ae96e/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list