[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus proposal: renaming member categories
maestro415 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 8 20:48:13 UTC 2013
If you continue to feed them they won't stay UNDER the bridge.
On Sunday, December 8, 2013, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> [forwarding a sarcasm from someone who
> wants to be anonymous]
> How about Noisebridge Gestapo or NoisebridgeSS?
> [From me]
> Charles Tang wrote some very well expressed
> criticisms of the Noisebridge activists who seem
> [to me] to be imposing their views on others:
> Tom, Al, Jake (spaz), Danny, and others.
> I know you activists are driven by
> frustration, but the result is angry and
> inconsiderate; patience is a virtue.
> On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 18:44 -0800, Tom Lowenthal wrote:
>> I have proposed the following on the [upcoming consensus items] page:
>> > Renaming the category “Noisebridge Members” to the “Noisebridge
>> > renaming the category “Associate Members” to “Noisebridge Members”.
>> > extends not only to our operations, but also to our bylaws, so that
the effect is only
>> > a change of name but does not change the rights or privileges of any
>> > category of people.
>> If this topic is of interest to you, I invite you to come discuss it
>> on Tuesday. I'm not a huge fan of the string “Noisebridge Council”,
>> and would be interested in other options. “Noisebridge High Cabal”,
>> See you Tuesday,
>> : https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
*~the quieter you become, the more you are able to hear...*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss